Author
Listed:
- Pan Shu
(Fuzhou University)
- Junfeng Chu
(Fuzhou University
Fuzhou University)
- Yanyan Wang
(Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine)
- Yingming Wang
(Fuzhou University
Fuzhou University)
Abstract
In recent years, the issue of large-scale group decision-making (LSGDM) has garnered widespread attention. Considering that decision-makers (DMs) may come from various professional fields and possess different knowledge backgrounds, they often use heterogeneous preference structures to provide their evaluation opinions and exhibit different psychological behaviors in the decision-making process. To address this, this paper proposes a novel heterogeneous LSGDM model that integrates decision-making theory with prospect theory, taking into account the psychological behaviors of DMs. Firstly, the large group of experts is divided into different communities based on the departmental information, and opinion representatives from each community are identified based on the trust relationships among experts to reduce the complexity within the DMs. Secondly, during the individual selection phase, the heterogeneous preference information of the experts is transformed into preference orderings through a direct method, and a preference approval structure is introduced to determine the reference point in prospect theory. Subsequently, the prospect value function calculates the experts' and the group's prospect values regarding alternatives. Furthermore, this paper designs a two-stage feedback mechanism to adjust the experts' evaluation information and preference approval structure, thereby enhancing the level of group consensus. Finally, the methodology presented in this paper was applied to a specific case and successfully resulted in an optimal solution, providing a new approach to address enterprise financial investment decision-making problems.
Suggested Citation
Pan Shu & Junfeng Chu & Yanyan Wang & Yingming Wang, 2025.
"A Prospect Theory-Based Consensus Method for Heterogeneous Large-Scale Group Decision-Making,"
Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 34(6), pages 1371-1400, December.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:grdene:v:34:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s10726-025-09949-6
DOI: 10.1007/s10726-025-09949-6
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:34:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s10726-025-09949-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.