Author
Abstract
R. L. Ackoff initiated a discussion about the possibility of such a “way of organizing a society, which would stimulate more social and individual development than socialism and capitalism do it”, and he called it a developing society. In continuation of the started discussion, the article that is proposed to the reader, traces evolution of ideas on the management processes organization in the society and substantiates necessity to create the science on the management in a developing society. In his monograph “Cybernetics and Society”, N. Wiener set forth his expectations of results of social life cybernation, which he associated with the use of new emerging opportunities “for the benefit of man, rather than merely for profits”. However, the success of society cybernation was largely due not to the fact that “the world has become kinder”, but to the “instrumental performance”: the widespread use of Informatics and Computer science, often becoming an end in itself, came to the foreground. The man with his vital needs and spiritual requirements dropped out of sight of the cybernetic systems creators. In order to remedy this situation, this article presents a postnonclassical approach to create the science of management processes organization in a developing society, the focus of which is “the man of culture”, i.e. the man, not just adhering to cultural norms, but also creating new concepts and products of culture. This science is proposed to be called Evergetics (Greek’s e v ergét i s–benefactor) and determined as the science of management processes organization in a developing society, each member of which is interested in augmenting his cultural heritage he is producing, which entails a raise of cultural potential of the society as a whole and, as a consequence, an increase in the proportion of moral and ethical managerial decisions and corresponding to them benevolent actions in public life.
Suggested Citation
V. A. Vittikh, 2015.
"Evolution of Ideas on Management Processes in the Society: From Cybernetics to Evergetics,"
Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 825-832, September.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:grdene:v:24:y:2015:i:5:d:10.1007_s10726-014-9414-6
DOI: 10.1007/s10726-014-9414-6
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:24:y:2015:i:5:d:10.1007_s10726-014-9414-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.