Author
Listed:
- Anisur Rehman
(University of Ha’il)
- Aftab Ara
(University of Ha’il)
- Harman Preet Singh
(University of Ha’il)
Abstract
Saudi Arabia ranks amongst those nations with the highest amount of fossil carbon dioxide emissions. Due to the rising environmental and economic sustainability challenges in Saudi Arabia, investigating environmental sustainability in the nation has become imperative. Similar to business organisations, universities in Saudi Arabia are also intensifying their initiatives to enhance sustainability, contending with the nation’s established dependence on increasing greenhouse gas emissions, high energy and fossil fuels. There is a gap in research on the green human resource management (GHRM) practices of these universities aimed at promoting sustainability with the involvement of their faculty members. To address this gap, this study employs ability–motivation–opportunity (AMO) theory and change management theory to examine the effect of GHRM practices on the organisational citizenship behaviour towards environment (OCBE) and environmental performance (EP) of universities in Saudi Arabia. This study also investigates the moderating effect of technological competence and resistance to change on the association of GHRM practices with OCBE and EP. Results demonstrate that all three GHRM practices (green training and development, green employee involvement and green performance appraisal) have a positive and significant impact on OCBE, which subsequently influences EP. The mediating effect of OCBE and the moderating effects of technological competence and resistance to change were also confirmed. This study advances the existing research on the influence of GHRM practices on environmental outcomes through the lens of the AMO framework and change management theory in the university context of Saudi Arabia. This pioneering study also explores the role of technological competence and resistance to change as moderators in the above relationship. In addition to theoretical implications, this study offers novel insights for policymakers in higher educational institutions.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:futbus:v:11:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s43093-025-00657-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.