IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/fininn/v11y2025i1d10.1186_s40854-025-00780-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal expenditure decentralization for sustainable development: evidence from a 52-country panel analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Hui Jin

    (Zhejiang Sci-Tech University)

  • Fu-Sheng Tsai

    (North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power
    City University of Macau)

  • Jorge Martinez-Vazquez

    (Georgia State University)

Abstract

In response to the critical need to balance fiscal expenditure governance with sustainable development, this study identifies the optimal level of fiscal expenditure decentralization that enhances sustainable outcomes. The study aims to determine the optimal expenditure decentralization that maximizes sustainable development outcomes across these dimensions. Theoretically, we analyze the impact mechanism of expenditure decentralization on sustainable development and hypothesize that there is an inverted U-shaped relationship between them, along with the possibility of finding an optimal level of expenditure decentralization. We test this hypothesis by measuring sustainable development in the context of a panel data set for 52 countries covering the period 1991–2016 using the National Sustainable Development Index (NSDI). We find strong support for the inverted U-shaped relationship between expenditure decentralization and sustainable development in both the short and long run. Sustainable development is the coordination of economic, social, and environmental development to balance intergenerational welfare and maximize the total welfare of all generations. Excessive and insufficient expenditure decentralization can potentially negatively affect the efficiency of public goods provision and residents’ utility, thereby adversely impacting total welfare and sustainable development. The results are robust to alternative specifications and to IV estimation to correct for potential endogeneity. The expenditure decentralization level most conducive to sustainable development lies between 30.9% and 34.5%. The optimal decentralization range was determined using the Lind–Mehlum method, supporting the main findings of this study. This research thus contributes to the literature by quantifying the complex relationship between fiscal decentralization policies and sustainable development, providing a clear, actionable pathway for policymakers seeking sustainable outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Hui Jin & Fu-Sheng Tsai & Jorge Martinez-Vazquez, 2025. "Optimal expenditure decentralization for sustainable development: evidence from a 52-country panel analysis," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 1-29, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:fininn:v:11:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s40854-025-00780-1
    DOI: 10.1186/s40854-025-00780-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s40854-025-00780-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s40854-025-00780-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H20 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - General
    • H70 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - General
    • M40 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - General
    • N20 - Economic History - - Financial Markets and Institutions - - - General, International, or Comparative

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:fininn:v:11:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s40854-025-00780-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.