IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eurphb/v90y2017i12d10.1140_epjb_e2017-80357-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the continuing relevance of Mandelbrot’s non-ergodic fractional renewal models of 1963 to 1967

Author

Listed:
  • Nicholas W. Watkins

    (Centre for the Analysis of Time Series, London School of Economics and Political Science
    Centre for Fusion, Space and Astrophysics, University of Warwick
    Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, Open University)

Abstract

The problem of “1∕f” noise has been with us for about a century. Because it is so often framed in Fourier spectral language, the most famous solutions have tended to be the stationary long range dependent (LRD) models such as Mandelbrot’s fractional Gaussian noise. In view of the increasing importance to physics of non-ergodic fractional renewal models, and their links to the CTRW, I present preliminary results of my research into the history of Mandelbrot’s very little known work in that area from 1963 to 1967. I speculate about how the lack of awareness of this work in the physics and statistics communities may have affected the development of complexity science, and I discuss the differences between the Hurst effect, “1∕f” noise and LRD, concepts which are often treated as equivalent.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicholas W. Watkins, 2017. "On the continuing relevance of Mandelbrot’s non-ergodic fractional renewal models of 1963 to 1967," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 90(12), pages 1-9, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:eurphb:v:90:y:2017:i:12:d:10.1140_epjb_e2017-80357-3
    DOI: 10.1140/epjb/e2017-80357-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1140/epjb/e2017-80357-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1140/epjb/e2017-80357-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eurphb:v:90:y:2017:i:12:d:10.1140_epjb_e2017-80357-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.