IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eurphb/v79y2011i1p99-106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamical phase transitions in Hegselmann-Krause model of opinion dynamics and consensus

Author

Listed:
  • F. Slanina

Abstract

The dynamics of the model of agents with limited confidence introduced by Hegselmann and Krause exhibits multiple well-separated regimes characterised by the number of distinct clusters in the stationary state. We present indications that there are genuine dynamical phase transitions between these regimes. The main indicator is the divergence of the average evolution time required to reach the stationary state. The slowdown close to the transition is connected with the emergence of the groups of mediator agents which are very small but have decisive role in the process of social convergence. More detailed study shows that the histogram of the evolution times is composed of several peaks. These peaks are unambiguously interpreted as corresponding to mediator groups consisting of one, two, three etc. agents. Detailed study reveals that each transition possesses also an internal fine structure. Copyright EDP Sciences, SIF, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Suggested Citation

  • F. Slanina, 2011. "Dynamical phase transitions in Hegselmann-Krause model of opinion dynamics and consensus," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 79(1), pages 99-106, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:eurphb:v:79:y:2011:i:1:p:99-106
    DOI: 10.1140/epjb/e2010-10568-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1140/epjb/e2010-10568-y
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1140/epjb/e2010-10568-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eurphb:v:79:y:2011:i:1:p:99-106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.