IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eurphb/v56y2007i4p291-295.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Statistical analysis of shear cracks on rock surfaces

Author

Listed:
  • J. A. Åström

Abstract

A set of 3873 cracks on exposed granite rock surfaces are analyzed in order to investigate possible fracture mechanisms. The fracture patterns are compared with the Mohr-Coulomb and the Roscoe fracture models, which can be combined into a single fracture scheme. A third model for comparison is based on interacting `penny-shaped' micro cracks introduced by Healy et al. [Nature 439, 64 (2006)]. The former models predict a bimodal fracture angle distribution, with two narrow peaks separated by 60 ○ -90 ○ symmetrically on both sides of the direction of the largest principal stress, while the latter predicts a single broader peak in the same direction with standard deviation in the range 15 ○ -20 ○ . The crack length distributions seem consistent with numerical simulation, whereas the fracture patterns are Euclidean rather than fractal. The statistical analyses indicate that none of the models fully describe the fracture patterns. It seems that natural shear fractures easily become a complex combination of different fracture mechanisms. Copyright EDP Sciences/Società Italiana di Fisica/Springer-Verlag 2007

Suggested Citation

  • J. A. Åström, 2007. "Statistical analysis of shear cracks on rock surfaces," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 56(4), pages 291-295, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:eurphb:v:56:y:2007:i:4:p:291-295
    DOI: 10.1140/epjb/e2007-00138-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1140/epjb/e2007-00138-y
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1140/epjb/e2007-00138-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eurphb:v:56:y:2007:i:4:p:291-295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.