IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eurphb/v42y2004i1p63-83.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The trion: two electrons plus one hole versus one electron plus one exciton

Author

Listed:
  • M. Combescot
  • O. Betbeder-Matibet
  • F. Dubin

Abstract

We first show that, for problems dealing with trions, it is totally hopeless to use the standard many-body description in terms of electrons and holes and its associated Feynman diagrams. We then show how, by using a description as electrons interacting with excitons, we can obtain the trion absorption through far simpler electron-exciton diagrams. These diagrams are indeed novel because, for excitons being not exact bosons, standard procedures designed to deal with interacting true fermions or true bosons cannot be used. A new many-body formalism is in fact necessary to establish the validity of these electron-exciton diagrams. It relies on the “commutation technique” we recently developed to treat interaction with composite bosons. This technique generates a scattering associated to Coulomb processes between electrons and excitons, without electron exchange, and a “scattering” associated to electron exchange inside the electron-exciton pairs, without Coulomb process -- this Pauli scattering being the original part of our new many-body theory. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin/Heidelberg 2004

Suggested Citation

  • M. Combescot & O. Betbeder-Matibet & F. Dubin, 2004. "The trion: two electrons plus one hole versus one electron plus one exciton," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 42(1), pages 63-83, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:eurphb:v:42:y:2004:i:1:p:63-83
    DOI: 10.1140/epjb/e2004-00358-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1140/epjb/e2004-00358-7
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1140/epjb/e2004-00358-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eurphb:v:42:y:2004:i:1:p:63-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.