Author
Listed:
- Zhui Liu
(Shihezi University)
- Yuchun Tian
(Shihezi University)
Abstract
National governance principles play an important role in shaping micro-level enterprise governance. In the context of building an innovative nation, investigating how corruption governance influences enterprise innovation provides valuable insights for enterprises’ innovation decision-making. Based on resource dependence theory and organizational ambidexterity theory, we investigate the impact of corruption governance on enterprise innovation and ambidextrous innovation. We use data from China’s A-share listed enterprises between 2007 and 2022, employing China’s anti-corruption campaign as a quasi-natural experiment. Our findings show the following: (1) Corruption governance has a positive impact on enterprise innovation—specifically exploratory and exploitative innovation—with a stronger influence on exploitative innovation, and this effect is also sustained in the long run. (2) Corruption governance reduces both implicit and explicit corrupt practices in enterprises while increasing their financing and risk-bearing capacities, ultimately encouraging exploratory and exploitative innovation. (3) The effects of corruption governance on exploratory and exploitative innovation are the same regardless of enterprise ownership. Corruption governance has a greater impact on both types of innovation in large enterprises, high-tech industries, and enterprises that receive more media attention. In industries with high competition and regions with more comprehensive formal institutions, corruption governance has a greater impact on exploratory innovation. These findings highlight the long-term positive role of corruption governance in enterprises and provide theoretical and practical insights for strategic decisions in enterprise ambidextrous innovation.
Suggested Citation
Zhui Liu & Yuchun Tian, 2025.
"The impact of corruption governance on enterprise ambidextrous innovation: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China,"
Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 15(2), pages 349-384, June.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:eurasi:v:15:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s40821-025-00308-8
DOI: 10.1007/s40821-025-00308-8
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eurasi:v:15:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s40821-025-00308-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.