IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eujoag/v22y2025i1d10.1007_s10433-025-00890-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effectiveness of interventions on clinical and patient-reported outcomes in hospital-to-home transitions of older adults: a systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Maria Steiner

    (University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland
    Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale)

  • Selvedina Osmancevic

    (Medical University of Graz)

  • Sabine Hahn

    (Bern University of Applied Sciences)

  • Loris Bonetti

    (University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland
    Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale)

  • Sandra Zwakhalen

    (Care and Public Health Research Institute CAPHRI, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University)

Abstract

The global ageing population presents growing challenges for health and social care systems, particularly during transitions from hospital to home for older adults. These high-risk periods are associated with functional decline, hospital readmissions, and reduced quality of life. This systematic review synthesised evidence from 25 randomised controlled trials (RCTs), involving 17,542 participants aged 65 and older, to evaluate the effectiveness of transitional care interventions. A comprehensive search of PubMed, CINAHL Complete, and Scopus was conducted for studies published between January 2013 and March 2024. Outcomes were categorised using the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) taxonomy into four domains: clinical outcomes, life impact, resource use, and death/adverse events. Most interventions were multicomponent, combining structured discharge planning, caregiver involvement, follow-up, and home-based support, typically delivered by multidisciplinary teams. Interventions were frequently associated with improvements in functional status, mood, and nutritional outcomes, as well as modest reductions in hospital readmissions and emergency department visits in the short term. Few studies assessed outcomes beyond six months, and sustained effects were uncommon. Few interventions demonstrated effects on mortality or adverse events. Caregiver engagement, particularly involving informal caregivers, and early post-discharge follow-up emerged as key enablers of success. Due to considerable heterogeneity in intervention design and outcomes, findings were synthesised narratively. This review highlights the potential of personalised, interdisciplinary transitional care models tailored to the complex needs of older adults. Future research should prioritise long-term outcomes, patient-reported experiences, and the development of scalable, context-sensitive strategies, including digital tools and caregiver-inclusive approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Maria Steiner & Selvedina Osmancevic & Sabine Hahn & Loris Bonetti & Sandra Zwakhalen, 2025. "The effectiveness of interventions on clinical and patient-reported outcomes in hospital-to-home transitions of older adults: a systematic review," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:eujoag:v:22:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10433-025-00890-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s10433-025-00890-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10433-025-00890-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10433-025-00890-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eujoag:v:22:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10433-025-00890-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.