IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eujoag/v14y2017i2d10.1007_s10433-016-0399-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differential age-related changes in localizing a target among distractors across an extended visual field

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Feng

    (North Carolina State University)

  • Fergus I. M. Craik

    (Baycrest Health Sciences
    University of Toronto)

  • Brian Levine

    (Baycrest Health Sciences
    University of Toronto)

  • Sylvain Moreno

    (Baycrest Health Sciences
    Baycrest Health Sciences
    University of Toronto)

  • Gary Naglie

    (Baycrest Health Sciences
    Baycrest Health Sciences
    University of Toronto
    University of Toronto)

  • HeeSun Choi

    (North Carolina State University)

Abstract

Age differences in the spatial distribution of attention over a wide field of view have only been described in terms of the spatial extent, leaving the topographical aspect unexplored. This study examined age differences between younger and older adults in good general health in an important topographical characteristic, the asymmetry between the upper and lower visual fields. In Experiment 1, we found age differences across the entire attentional visual field. In addition, age differences were greater in the upper compared to the lower field. In Experiment 2, we examined whether the finding of a greater age difference in the ability to localize a target among distractors in the upper visual field in Experiment 1 was a result of possible differential age differences between the upper and lower visual fields in the ability to localize a target even when there was no distractor competing for attention. Our results suggested that the age differences we observed were linked to age differences in the ability to filter out distractors that compete with the target for attention rather than the ability to process only the target over a wide field of view. While younger adults demonstrated an upper visual field advantage in the ability to localize a target among distractors, there was no such field advantage in older adults. We discuss this finding of diminished upper visual field advantage in older adults in light of an account of pervasive loss of neural specialization with age. We postulate that one possible explanation of age differences in the asymmetry between the upper and lower visual fields may be an adaptation to age-related physical decline. We also discuss important implications of our findings in risks of falls and vehicle crashes.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Feng & Fergus I. M. Craik & Brian Levine & Sylvain Moreno & Gary Naglie & HeeSun Choi, 2017. "Differential age-related changes in localizing a target among distractors across an extended visual field," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 167-177, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:eujoag:v:14:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s10433-016-0399-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10433-016-0399-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10433-016-0399-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10433-016-0399-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eujoag:v:14:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s10433-016-0399-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.