IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eujhec/v26y2025i9d10.1007_s10198-025-01797-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychometric comparison of CHU9D and PedsQL 4.0 proxy version administered to parents of children with congenital colorectal conditions in Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Tianxin Pan

    (The University of Melbourne
    Murdoch Children’s Research Institute)

  • Misel Trajanovska

    (Murdoch Children’s Research Institute
    The Royal Children’s Hospital
    The University of Melbourne)

  • Nathan Kwong

    (The University of Melbourne)

  • Sebastian K. King

    (Murdoch Children’s Research Institute
    The Royal Children’s Hospital
    The University of Melbourne)

  • Ilias Goranitis

    (The University of Melbourne
    Australian Genomics, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute)

Abstract

Objective To assess the psychometric performance of the Child Health Utility (CHU9D) proxy version compared with the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) in Australian children aged 0–7 years with anorectal malformations (ARM) or Hirschsprung disease (HD). Methods Parents of children with ARM or HD were identified from a patient database managed by a tertiary paediatric hospital in Australia over the past 20 years. Since 2020, CHU9D and PedsQL proxy report versions were administered to parents via telephone interview. Using data collected between 2020 and 2022, we assessed the feasibility, ceiling and floor effects, known-group validity and convergent validity for both instruments in the total sample, by conditions and child age. Results The study included 145 children with ARM or HD, among which, 13.1% had missing values on the CHU9D schoolwork dimension, and 20.7% had missing values on the PedsQL school functioning domain (2–4 year old version). The CHU9D and PedsQL did not demonstrate ceiling effects. The CHU9D showed stronger effect size (ES) in differentiating children with ARM (ES = 0.32) or HD (ES = 0.90) with healthy children compared to the PedsQL. We did not find statistically significant differences in CHU9D or PedsQL scores between ARM and HD. There were moderate to strong correlations in most theoretically related dimensions of the CHU9D and PedsQL. Conclusion The CHU9D and PedsQL demonstrated comparable and acceptable psychometric properties in Australian children aged 2 years and above with ARM or HD. However, the validity of the CHU9D in children under 2 years old needs to be further explored and modification may be needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Tianxin Pan & Misel Trajanovska & Nathan Kwong & Sebastian K. King & Ilias Goranitis, 2025. "Psychometric comparison of CHU9D and PedsQL 4.0 proxy version administered to parents of children with congenital colorectal conditions in Australia," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 26(9), pages 1671-1682, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:26:y:2025:i:9:d:10.1007_s10198-025-01797-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10198-025-01797-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10198-025-01797-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10198-025-01797-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:26:y:2025:i:9:d:10.1007_s10198-025-01797-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.