IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eujhec/v26y2025i7d10.1007_s10198-025-01768-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of parastomal hernia on quality of life using data from the CIPHER prospective cohort study

Author

Listed:
  • Joel Glynn

    (University of Bristol)

  • William Hollingworth

    (University of Bristol)

  • Jessica Harris

    (University of Bristol)

  • Syed Mohiuddin

    (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE))

  • Lucy Ellis

    (University of Bristol)

  • Barnaby C. Reeves

    (University of Bristol)

  • Neil Smart

    (Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust)

Abstract

Objectives Despite being a common side effect of stoma surgery, little is known about the health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) impact of parastomal hernia (PSH). We studied the association between HRQoL and self-reported PSH using data from the large CIPHER prospective cohort study of patients living with a stoma. Methods Over 12 months, HRQoL was captured at up to four time points for 2,341 individuals with stomas using EuroQol-5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L). Applying a repeated measures regression, we analysed the association between HRQoL and the incidence of self-reported PSH in the year following surgery. Using ordinal regressions, we estimated the odds of reporting worse function in each of the five EQ-5D-5L dimensions among those reporting PSH. We estimated the average number of quality-adjusted life days (QALDs) lost in those reporting PSH. Results Patients experiencing PSH reported significantly lower EQ-5D-5L scores at 12 months following stoma formation (−0.099 [95%CI: −0.126 to −0.071]), amounting to 22.3 QALDs lost per-person-per year. Patients reporting PSH at 12 months had more problems in all EQ-5D-5L dimensions. In four of five dimensions, patients with PSH had more than double the odds of reporting worse HRQoL levels; the difference was most substantial for pain/discomfort (odds ratio 2.80 [95%CI: 2.17 to 3.62]). Conclusion Developing PSH significantly reduces HRQoL across a range of health outcomes, including pain/ discomfort, usual activities, self-care, mobility, and anxiety/depression. Therefore, developing and evaluating surgical techniques to prevent PSH is important to reduce the prevalence of PSH following stoma formation. Estimates of HRQoL presented here can be used in cost-effectiveness studies evaluating such interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Joel Glynn & William Hollingworth & Jessica Harris & Syed Mohiuddin & Lucy Ellis & Barnaby C. Reeves & Neil Smart, 2025. "The impact of parastomal hernia on quality of life using data from the CIPHER prospective cohort study," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 26(7), pages 1209-1218, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:26:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s10198-025-01768-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10198-025-01768-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10198-025-01768-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10198-025-01768-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    JEL classification:

    • I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:26:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s10198-025-01768-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.