IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eujhec/v19y2018i6d10.1007_s10198-017-0924-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Guidelines versus reality: is coronary stent application in three-vessel disease standard or the exception?

Author

Listed:
  • Roland Linder

    () (Wissenschaftliches Institut der Techniker Krankenkasse (WINEG))

  • J. Zeidler

    (Leibniz University Hannover)

  • F. Verheyen

    (Wissenschaftliches Institut der Techniker Krankenkasse (WINEG))

  • J.-M. Graf Schulenburg

    (Leibniz University Hannover)

  • A. Haverich

    (Hannover Medical School)

  • T. Schilling

    (Hannover Medical School)

Abstract

The national guidelines for treatment of chronic coronary heart disease (CHD) recommend surgical coronary aortic bypass grafting (CABG) rather than percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with a coronary three-vessel disease. The epidemiology of three-vessel CHD and data about the application of different revascularisation strategies raise suspicion of deviation from the guidelines in the treatment of those patients. Claims data containing records of almost 10 million patients of the largest German statutory health insurance fund (Techniker Krankenkasse) were utilised to measure adherence to the guidelines for treatment of groups of patients with one-, two-, and three-vessel CHD, respectively. The impact of age, sex, and comorbidity on each patient’s revascularisation procedure was investigated as well. There was no significant difference in the rate of PCI between the groups. In conclusion, the hypothesis that patients with a coronary three-vessel disease are not always treated according to the recommendations of the national guidelines could not be disproved by this study. Finally, the results of this study suggest that the best revascularisation strategy for each patient with two- and three-vessel disease should be decided upon by an interdisciplinary discussion between both cardiologists and cardiac surgeons.

Suggested Citation

  • Roland Linder & J. Zeidler & F. Verheyen & J.-M. Graf Schulenburg & A. Haverich & T. Schilling, 2018. "Guidelines versus reality: is coronary stent application in three-vessel disease standard or the exception?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 19(6), pages 821-830, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:19:y:2018:i:6:d:10.1007_s10198-017-0924-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10198-017-0924-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10198-017-0924-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Chronic coronary heart disease; Coronary aortic bypass grafting; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Claims data; Health services research;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General
    • I19 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:19:y:2018:i:6:d:10.1007_s10198-017-0924-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.