IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envsyd/v36y2016i3d10.1007_s10669-016-9605-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Panarchy use in environmental science for risk and resilience planning

Author

Listed:
  • David G. Angeler

    (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences)

  • Craig R. Allen

    (University of Nebraska - Lincoln)

  • Ahjond S. Garmestani

    (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency)

  • Lance H. Gunderson

    (Emory University)

  • Igor Linkov

    (U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center)

Abstract

Environmental sciences have an important role in informing sustainable management of built environments by providing insights about the drivers and potentially negative impacts of global environmental change. Here, we discuss panarchy theory, a multi-scale hierarchical concept that accounts for the dynamism of complex socio-ecological systems, especially for those systems with strong cross-scale feedbacks. The idea of panarchy underlies much of system resilience, focusing on how systems respond to known and unknown threats. Panarchy theory can provide a framework for qualitative and quantitative research and application in the environmental sciences, which can in turn inform the ongoing efforts in socio-technical resilience thinking and adaptive and transformative approaches to management.

Suggested Citation

  • David G. Angeler & Craig R. Allen & Ahjond S. Garmestani & Lance H. Gunderson & Igor Linkov, 2016. "Panarchy use in environmental science for risk and resilience planning," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 225-228, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:36:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s10669-016-9605-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10669-016-9605-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10669-016-9605-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10669-016-9605-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Berkes, Fikret & Ross, Helen, 2016. "Panarchy and community resilience: Sustainability science and policy implications," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 185-193.
    2. Sabrina Larkin & Cate Fox-Lent & Daniel A. Eisenberg & Benjamin D. Trump & Sean Wallace & Colin Chadderton & Igor Linkov, 2015. "Benchmarking agency and organizational practices in resilience decision making," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 185-195, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jesse M. Keenan, 2018. "Regional resilience trust funds: an exploratory analysis for leveraging insurance surcharges," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 118-139, March.
    2. Kai Greenlees & Randolph Cornelius, 2021. "The promise of panarchy in managed retreat: converging psychological perspectives and complex adaptive systems theory," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 11(3), pages 503-510, September.
    3. H. Klammler & P. S. C. Rao & K. Hatfield, 2018. "Modeling dynamic resilience in coupled technological-social systems subjected to stochastic disturbance regimes," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 140-159, March.
    4. Zachary A. Collier & James H. Lambert & Igor Linkov, 2016. "Latest journal news and introduction to the September issue of environment systems and decisions," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 223-224, September.
    5. Heinzel, Christine & van der Heijden, Sophie & Mayer, Aljoscha & Sänger, Nathalie & Sandholz, Simone, 2024. "Need for intensive care? A socio-technical systems perspective on water supply failure preparedness in German health care facilities," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    6. Kofi Akamani, 2020. "Integrating Deep Ecology and Adaptive Governance for Sustainable Development: Implications for Protected Areas Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-21, July.
    7. C. Emdad Haque & Mahed-Ul-Islam Choudhury & Md. Sowayib Sikder, 2019. "“Events and failures are our only means for making policy changes”: learning in disaster and emergency management policies in Manitoba, Canada," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 98(1), pages 137-162, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kai Greenlees & Randolph Cornelius, 2021. "The promise of panarchy in managed retreat: converging psychological perspectives and complex adaptive systems theory," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 11(3), pages 503-510, September.
    2. C. Emdad Haque & Mahed-Ul-Islam Choudhury & Md. Sowayib Sikder, 2019. "“Events and failures are our only means for making policy changes”: learning in disaster and emergency management policies in Manitoba, Canada," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 98(1), pages 137-162, August.
    3. Hatice Şengül & Dilem Marşan & Tuğçe Gün, 2019. "Survey assessment of organizational resiliency potential of a group of Seveso organizations in Turkey," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(3), pages 470-486, June.
    4. Jesse M. Keenan, 2018. "Regional resilience trust funds: an exploratory analysis for leveraging insurance surcharges," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 118-139, March.
    5. Leslie Gillespie‐Marthaler & Katherine Nelson & Hiba Baroud & Mark Abkowitz, 2019. "Selecting Indicators for Assessing Community Sustainable Resilience," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(11), pages 2479-2498, November.
    6. Fielke, Simon J. & Kaye-Blake, William & Mackay, Alec & Smith, Willie & Rendel, John & Dominati, Estelle, 2018. "Learning from resilience research: Findings from four projects in New Zealand," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 322-333.
    7. Ivo Häring & Mirjam Fehling-Kaschek & Natalie Miller & Katja Faist & Sebastian Ganter & Kushal Srivastava & Aishvarya Kumar Jain & Georg Fischer & Kai Fischer & Jörg Finger & Alexander Stolz & Tobias , 2021. "A performance-based tabular approach for joint systematic improvement of risk control and resilience applied to telecommunication grid, gas network, and ultrasound localization system," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 286-329, June.
    8. Angelo Jonas Imperiale & Frank Vanclay, 2021. "Conceptualizing community resilience and the social dimensions of risk to overcome barriers to disaster risk reduction and sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(5), pages 891-905, September.
    9. Zephan Wade & Gregory S. Parnell & Simon Goerger & Ed Pohl & Eric Specking, 2019. "Convergent set-based design for complex resilient systems," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 118-127, June.
    10. Rike Stotten, 2024. "The natural domain and its social representation in the community resilience concept," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(2), pages 1458-1470, April.
    11. Shashi & Piera Centobelli & Roberto Cerchione & Myriam Ertz, 2020. "Managing supply chain resilience to pursue business and environmental strategies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1215-1246, March.
    12. Cate Fox-Lent & Matthew E. Bates & Igor Linkov, 2015. "A matrix approach to community resilience assessment: an illustrative case at Rockaway Peninsula," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 209-218, June.
    13. Gavin Melles & Ethmadalage Dineth Perera, 2020. "Resilience Thinking and Strategies to Reclaim Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: Cascade Tank-Village System (CTVS) in Sri Lanka," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, October.
    14. Eric Specking & Bobby Cottam & Gregory Parnell & Edward Pohl & Matthew Cilli & Randy Buchanan & Zephan Wade & Colin Small, 2019. "Assessing Engineering Resilience for Systems with Multiple Performance Measures," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(9), pages 1899-1912, September.
    15. Ziwei Wang & Zhichao Xue & Xuexia Zhang & Huimin Yan & Guihuan Liu, 2025. "Adaptive Capacity to Climate Change in Pastoral Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-18, February.
    16. Katherine E. Laycock & Wayne Caldwell, 2018. "Exploring Community Cohesion in Rural Canada Post-Extreme Weather: Planning Ahead for Unknown Stresses," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 139(1), pages 77-97, August.
    17. Kyle D. Buck & Rebecca J. Dunn & Mary K. Bennett & Justin J. Bousquin, 2023. "Influence of cross-scale measures on neighborhood resilience," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 119(2), pages 1011-1040, November.
    18. Mahed Choudhury & Haorui Wu & A. K. M. Shahidullah, 2024. "Improving the feedback loop between community‐ and policy‐level learning: Building resilience of coastal communities in Bangladesh," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(2), pages 1508-1524, April.
    19. Fikret Berkes, 2017. "Environmental Governance for the Anthropocene? Social-Ecological Systems, Resilience, and Collaborative Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-12, July.
    20. Xin Fu & Xinhao Wang, 2018. "Developing an integrative urban resilience capacity index for plan making," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 367-378, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:36:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s10669-016-9605-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.