IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v76y2026i6d10.1007_s00267-026-02498-x.html

Ecotourism in Traditional Cultural Landscapes: A Regenerative Lens on Stakeholder Perspectives in Vama Buzăului, Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Sandeep Joshi

    (Institute of Geography, University of Hildesheim)

  • Alexandra Bucur

    (Faculty of Geography, Babeș-Bolyai University)

  • Andrei Atomulese

    (Faculty of Geography, Babeș-Bolyai University)

  • Stefan Zerbe

    (Institute of Geography, University of Hildesheim
    University of Applied Science and Arts)

  • Martin Sauerwein

    (Institute of Geography, University of Hildesheim)

  • Sabine Panzer-Krause

    (Institute of Geography, University of Hildesheim)

Abstract

Traditional Multifunctional Cultural Landscapes (TMCLs) are coupled socio-ecological systems in which cultural heritage, land-use practices, and ecological functions co-exist and are co-produced. Ecotourism has increasingly been promoted as a tool for sustainable development in TMCLs, yet little empirical evidence exists on how local stakeholders perceive its impacts. This study explores stakeholder perspectives on ecotourism development in Vama Buzăului, Romania an eco-certified destination, and explores its implications through regenerative tourism lens. Semi-structured interviews with twelve diverse stakeholders provided insights into socio-cultural, economic, environmental, youth outmigration and governance-related impacts. The findings reveal that stakeholders associated ecotourism with socio-cultural revitalization (community pride, festivals, gastrolocal identity) but also raised concerns regarding crowding and cultural commodification. Economic perceptions emphasized new livelihood opportunities, indirect value-chain benefits for non-tourism actors, and improved infrastructure, alongside concerns about unequal benefit distribution and rising land prices. Environmental perceptions were ambivalent: stakeholders noted improved waste management and conservation initiatives (e.g., the bison reserve) while also highlighting litter, traffic congestion, and reduced communal grazing areas. Respondents further linked ecotourism to youth retention and land re-use, though outsider investment was perceived as a potential pressure on traditional land-use patterns. Finally, local government was viewed as a key enabler through administrative support and small-scale infrastructure development, while direct financial support was considered insufficient and future needs included diversified attractions, micro-loans, and capacity building. Interpreted through a regenerative lens, these outcomes demonstrate how ecotourism in TMCLs can move beyond sustaining existing systems to actively enhancing cultural vitality, community resilience, and ecosystem health. The study highlights the pivotal role of participatory governance and local government in enabling regenerative pathways, emphasizing inclusive planning, equitable benefit-sharing, and long-term policy support. Overall, Vama Buzăului provides an illustrative case of how TMCLs can serve as real life laboratories for regenerative rural development, offering lessons for destinations seeking to align ecotourism with holistic development while avoiding unidimensional growth-driven, unsustainable ecotourism models.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandeep Joshi & Alexandra Bucur & Andrei Atomulese & Stefan Zerbe & Martin Sauerwein & Sabine Panzer-Krause, 2026. "Ecotourism in Traditional Cultural Landscapes: A Regenerative Lens on Stakeholder Perspectives in Vama Buzăului, Romania," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 76(6), pages 1-17, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:76:y:2026:i:6:d:10.1007_s00267-026-02498-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-026-02498-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-026-02498-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-026-02498-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:76:y:2026:i:6:d:10.1007_s00267-026-02498-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.