IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v76y2026i6d10.1007_s00267-026-02483-4.html

Examining the Public’s Water Policy Tool Preferences: The Role of Blame Attribution

Author

Listed:
  • Minwoo Ahn

    (School of Landscape Architecture and Planning, University of Arizona)

  • Danielle M. McLaughlin

    (Martin School of Public Policy and Administration, University of Kentucky)

Abstract

Environmental problems such as water scarcity plague communities globally. We lack comprehensive understanding about the public’s preferences for different water policy instruments. In particular, the information environment we live in is filled with different blame attribution frames regarding these water problems. By merging blame attribution literatures to environmental issues, we ask the following question: Does blame attribution about the causes of water crises influence the public’s water policy preferences? Within this theoretical framework, we explore the effects of (1) outsider blame (2) political gridlock blame (3) all stakeholders blame (4) individual resident blame. Using a factorial between-subject design with 2000 participants in three water stressed states in the southwest US, we suggest that blame frames are systematically associated with support for different types of policies and that such effects differ by personal water impact. Our findings contribute to scholarly understanding about the role of blame frames in shaping the public’s environmental policy preferences.

Suggested Citation

  • Minwoo Ahn & Danielle M. McLaughlin, 2026. "Examining the Public’s Water Policy Tool Preferences: The Role of Blame Attribution," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 76(6), pages 1-16, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:76:y:2026:i:6:d:10.1007_s00267-026-02483-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-026-02483-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-026-02483-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-026-02483-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:76:y:2026:i:6:d:10.1007_s00267-026-02483-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.