Author
Abstract
Infrastructure projects exert profound and enduring influences on ecological systems and human societies, yet prevailing value management approaches prioritize economic metrics—time, cost, and quality—while marginalizing socio-environmental considerations and power dynamics. This study adopts a political ecology lens to reconceptualize stakeholder engagement and project value in infrastructure, advancing an integrated 4E framework encompassing enclosure (economic), exclusion (political), encroachment (ecological), and entrenchment (social). Through a qualitative case study of Nairobi’s Expressway—drawing on peer-reviewed literature, policy documents, and environmental impact assessments—the framework is applied thematically to uncover how power relations shape the creation and distribution of social, economic, and ecological value. Findings reveal that (1) economic enclosure concentrates benefits among private actors via privatization and toll mechanisms; (2) political exclusion marginalizes affected communities through tokenistic consultations; (3) ecological encroachment externalizes environmental costs, eroding green spaces and ecosystem services; and (4) social entrenchment reinforces inequalities by privileging affluent commuters. Central to these dynamics are the emergent notions of agency, empowerment, and vulnerability, which elucidate how non-market stakeholders negotiate value amidst competing interests. The study contributes a novel theoretical model that integrates power-sensitive stakeholder analysis with multidimensional value assessment and offers practical guidance for policymakers and practitioners to adopt justice-oriented, value-centric governance. By embedding political ecology and the 4E framework into project inception, stakeholder engagement, and governance, infrastructure initiatives can more equitably address grand challenges such as climate change, social injustice, and biodiversity loss.
Suggested Citation
Jaicky Harish Gurnani, 2026.
"Adopting a Political Ecology Approach to Understanding Stakeholder Roles and Values in Infrastructure Initiatives,"
Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 76(6), pages 1-16, June.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:envman:v:76:y:2026:i:6:d:10.1007_s00267-026-02475-4
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-026-02475-4
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:76:y:2026:i:6:d:10.1007_s00267-026-02475-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.