Author
Abstract
Despite growing policy attention to sustainable natural resource management, limited empirical evidence explains how governance structures, stakeholder dynamics, and technological mechanisms jointly shape sustainability outcomes in resource-dependent industries. Existing studies predominantly rely on linear models and overlook the configurational and necessary conditions underpinning effective management. Addressing this theoretical and methodological gap, this study investigates how good governance, stakeholder engagement, green technology, and environmental impact assessment influence effective natural resource management in Bangladesh’s power and fuel industries. To capture both net effects and causal complexity, the study integrates Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM), fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA), and Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA) using survey data collected from industry professionals. The findings show that stakeholder engagement and green technology exert significant positive effects on management performance, while governance and environmental impact assessment operate as necessary institutional thresholds rather than standalone predictors. Configurational analysis further reveals multiple pathways through which governance, technology, and assessment mechanisms jointly produce high-performance outcomes. The study advances stakeholder and sustainability governance theory by demonstrating that resource management effectiveness emerges from complementary institutional, participatory, and technological conditions rather than isolated factors. From a managerial perspective, the findings underscore the need to strengthen governance quality, institutionalize rigorous environmental assessment processes, and foster stakeholder-driven technological adoption to achieve long-term sustainability in resource-intensive sectors.
Suggested Citation
Md. Mominur Rahman, 2026.
"Unveiling the Nexus of Governance, Stakeholder, and Technology Through Environmental Impact Assessment for Natural Resource Management,"
Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 76(4), pages 1-19, April.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:envman:v:76:y:2026:i:4:d:10.1007_s00267-026-02422-3
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-026-02422-3
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:76:y:2026:i:4:d:10.1007_s00267-026-02422-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.