IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v76y2026i4d10.1007_s00267-026-02407-2.html

Spatial Distribution and Environmental Risk Assessment of Neonicotinoids, Antibiotics, and Heavy Metals in the Yellow River Riparian Soils

Author

Listed:
  • Xu Liang

    (China University of Mining and Technology, School of Environment and Spatial Informatics)

  • Jiaxun Guo

    (China University of Mining and Technology, School of Environment and Spatial Informatics)

  • Wenju Lei

    (China University of Mining and Technology, School of Environment and Spatial Informatics)

  • Haitang Wang

    (China University of Mining and Technology, School of Environment and Spatial Informatics)

  • Qinya Fan

    (Tsinghua University, Center for Water and Ecology, School of Environment)

  • Shilong He

    (China University of Mining and Technology, School of Environment and Spatial Informatics)

Abstract

Co-occurring contaminants in riparian soils posed a growing threat to the sustainable development of the Yellow River Basin. However, understanding of the co-occurrence patterns and key drivers of heavy metals (HMs), antibiotics, and neonicotinoid insecticides (NNIs) at the watershed scale remains limited. Therefore, we selected surface soil along the Yellow River to analyze its content characteristics, spatial patterns, and interrelationships. Detection rates of NNIs, antibiotics, and HMs in soils exceeded 99%. The average content of total NNIs (∑8NNIs) was 5.118 ng/g, with thiacloprid (1.667 ng/g) being the predominant component (32.5%). Total antibiotics averaged 0.412 ng/g, dominated by quinolones (47.8%) and macrolides (30.9%). The concentrations of As, Cr, and Zn among the HMs were 5.7–18.0 μg/g, 53.4–91.1 μg/g, and 35.6–94.3 μg/g, respectively, exceeding their background values at 36%, 21%, and 37% of the sampling sites, respectively. Soil organic matter content and pH negatively correlated with NNIs but positively with HMs, while fine soil particles positively correlated with both. Furthermore, ∑8NNIs (7.680 ng/g) and the contents of thirteen antibiotics (∑13ABX, 13.956 ng/g) in corn-cultivated soils were higher than in other cropped types, while ∑8NNIs (0.780 ng/g) and ∑13ABX (0.003 ng/g) in reed marshes were lower than in other cultivated soils. Health and ecological risks were generally low across the study area, but some specific sites posed potential integrated contamination risks. The study provided scientific data on the environmental fate and risks of NNIs, antibiotics, and HMs in riparian soils of large-scale watersheds, and underscored the need for more efficient usage practices and integrated watershed management strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Xu Liang & Jiaxun Guo & Wenju Lei & Haitang Wang & Qinya Fan & Shilong He, 2026. "Spatial Distribution and Environmental Risk Assessment of Neonicotinoids, Antibiotics, and Heavy Metals in the Yellow River Riparian Soils," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 76(4), pages 1-13, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:76:y:2026:i:4:d:10.1007_s00267-026-02407-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-026-02407-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-026-02407-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-026-02407-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:76:y:2026:i:4:d:10.1007_s00267-026-02407-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.