Author
Listed:
- Vida Mantey
(University of Hohenheim, Hans-Ruthenberg-Institute of Agricultural Sciences in the Tropics)
- Regina Birner
(University of Hohenheim, Hans-Ruthenberg-Institute of Agricultural Sciences in the Tropics)
- Athena Birkenberg
(University of Hohenheim, Hans-Ruthenberg-Institute of Agricultural Sciences in the Tropics)
- Christine Bosch
(University of Hohenheim, Hans-Ruthenberg-Institute of Agricultural Sciences in the Tropics)
- Viviane Guesbeogo Yameogo
(University of Hohenheim, Hans-Ruthenberg-Institute of Agricultural Sciences in the Tropics)
- John Mburu
(University of Nairobi, Department of Agricultural Economics)
Abstract
Agricultural carbon projects are increasingly promoted as instruments to address climate change while supporting sustainable agriculture. These projects combine sustainable land management (SLM) practices with a carbon credit component, creating complex governance structures involving diverse actors with unequal power. Understanding the governance challenges that may impede their effective implementation is therefore essential. Despite growing evidence on the potential of digital tools in agriculture, their role in agricultural carbon projects remains underexplored. This study employs a qualitative case study of two pioneering carbon projects in Kenya, alongside a participatory and visual mapping tool (Process Net-Map), to engage with stakeholders. It combines concepts of principal-agent and bargaining power theory to analyse the governance challenges of agricultural carbon projects, and the potential role of digital tools in addressing them. The findings reveal layered principal-agent relationships in the carbon credit component, characterized by strict monitoring and external accountability, exacerbating information asymmetries and shifting performance risks to actors with limited bargaining power. While women play a pivotal role in implementation and monitoring, intra-household power relations constrain their control over assets and benefits, thereby reinforcing gender inequities. Digital tools currently support data collection and reporting, with potential to reduce transaction costs and improve accountability, but their use remains largely confined to the SLM component. Expanding digital tools beyond monitoring to support participation, transparency, and feedback could strengthen smallholder bargaining power. The current study contributes to literature by highlighting how the carbon credit component reshapes and intensifies existing SLM governance challenges and offers insights for project developers and policymakers seeking to promote more equitable and effective agricultural carbon initiatives.
Suggested Citation
Vida Mantey & Regina Birner & Athena Birkenberg & Christine Bosch & Viviane Guesbeogo Yameogo & John Mburu, 2026.
"Governance Challenges of Smallholder Agricultural Carbon Projects and the Potential of Digital Tools: Insights from Kenya,"
Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 76(3), pages 1-18, March.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:envman:v:76:y:2026:i:3:d:10.1007_s00267-026-02410-7
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-026-02410-7
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:76:y:2026:i:3:d:10.1007_s00267-026-02410-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.