Author
Listed:
- Suman Kumari
(Barrackpore, ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute)
- Pranab Gogoi
(Barrackpore, ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute)
- Lianthuamluaia
(Barrackpore, ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute)
- P. Mishal
(Barrackpore, ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute)
- Basanta Kumar Das
(Barrackpore, ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute)
- M. A. Hassan
(Barrackpore, ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute)
- U. K. Sarkar
(ICAR-National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources)
- A. K. Das
(Barrackpore, ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute)
Abstract
Anthropogenic and climatic changes are continuously altering the freshwater plankton, necessitating an evaluation of the complex structure of plankton communities to understand and mitigate these impacts. In this context, the present study focuses on evaluating the structure of plankton communities, specifically Phytoplankton Functional Groups (FGs) for assessing the environmental sensitivity of wetlands under changing scenario. These FGs are defined by shared adaptive features rather than taxonomic traits. Over the period from 2016 to 2018, two ecologically distinct wetlands were examined, analysing their phytoplankton FGs and their relationship with water quality parameters. Ecohydrological data revealed significant seasonal variations (p ≤ 0.05) in key parameters such as water depth, temperature, pH, electrical conductivity, dissolved oxygen, total alkalinity, total hardness, NO3-N, and PO4-P. Notably, there were no significant differences observed among the sampling stations within each wetland. A total of 125 phytoplankton genera/species were classified into 23 FGs in the open wetland and 22 FGs in the closed wetland. Spatial and seasonal analyses of dominant FGs suggested both wetlands were experiencing pollution pressures. This study highlights the powerful role of phytoplankton functional groups (FGs) as bioindicators of wetland health, uncovering pollution pressures. In open wetlands, 15 phytoplankton FGs with 36 key taxa (Indicator Value ≥ 40%) emerged as critical indicators, while in closed wetlands, only 10 FGs with 17 taxa were identified. To assess eutrophication, the occurrence of these indicator species was evaluated using BVSTEP function analysis. The study recommends pollution reduction in catchment areas and restoration of riverine connectivity to enhance FG diversity. Phytoplankton FG methodologies are deemed effective for assessing the environmental sensitivity of wetlands significantly impacted by human activities. This research offers a scientific foundation for the evaluation and restoration of wetland ecosystems.
Suggested Citation
Suman Kumari & Pranab Gogoi & Lianthuamluaia & P. Mishal & Basanta Kumar Das & M. A. Hassan & U. K. Sarkar & A. K. Das, 2024.
"The Potential Role of Phytoplankton Functional Groups Under Anthropogenic Stressed Wetlands: Characterizing The Environmental Sensitivity,"
Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 74(5), pages 870-885, November.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:envman:v:74:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s00267-024-02036-7
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-024-02036-7
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:74:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s00267-024-02036-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.