IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v74y2024i4d10.1007_s00267-024-02003-2.html

Do Mesocarnivores Respond to the Seasonality in Management Practices in an Agroforestry Landscape?

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Luísa Barros

    (Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, cE3c - Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes & CHANGE - Global Change and Sustainability Institute)

  • Diogo Raposo

    (Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, cE3c - Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes & CHANGE - Global Change and Sustainability Institute)

  • João David Almeida

    (Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, cE3c - Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes & CHANGE - Global Change and Sustainability Institute)

  • Sandra Alcobia

    (Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, cE3c - Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes & CHANGE - Global Change and Sustainability Institute)

  • Maria Alexandra Oliveira

    (Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, cE3c - Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes & CHANGE - Global Change and Sustainability Institute)

  • Darryl I. MacKenzie

    (Proteus Research and Consulting Ltd)

  • Margarida Santos-Reis

    (Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, cE3c - Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes & CHANGE - Global Change and Sustainability Institute)

Abstract

In the Mediterranean, we find a mosaic of natural and cultural landscapes, where a variety of forest management practices created intermediate disturbance regimes that potentially increased biodiversity values. Nonetheless, it is essential to understand the species’ long-term response to the dynamic management in agroecosystems, since the species tolerance to disturbance can change throughout the life cycle. Mammalian carnivores can be sensitive to human disturbance and are an essential part of ecosystems due to their regulatory and community structuring effects. We investigated the spatial response of five mesocarnivores species to spatially- and temporally- varying management practices in an agroforestry landscape. More specifically, we assessed the mesocarnivores’ temporal changes in space use by implementing multi-season occupancy models in a Bayesian framework, using seasonal camera-trapping surveys for a 2-year period. All species had a weak response of local extinction to forestry management and livestock grazing pressure. For forest-dwelling species, occupancy was higher where productivity of perennial vegetation was high, while colonization between seasons was positively associated with vegetation cover. For habitat generalist species, we found that occupancy in the wet season increased with the distance to cattle exclusion plots. Most of these plots are pine stands which are subject to forestry interventions during winter. During the 2-year period we found seasonal fluctuations in occupancy for all species, with an overall slight decrease for three mesocarnivore species, while for the two forest-dwelling species there was an increase in occupancy between years. The weak species response to management practices supports the importance of traditional management for upholding a diverse mesocarnivore community in agroforestry systems but could also reflect these species’ ecological plasticity and resilience to disturbance.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Luísa Barros & Diogo Raposo & João David Almeida & Sandra Alcobia & Maria Alexandra Oliveira & Darryl I. MacKenzie & Margarida Santos-Reis, 2024. "Do Mesocarnivores Respond to the Seasonality in Management Practices in an Agroforestry Landscape?," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 636-647, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:74:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s00267-024-02003-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-024-02003-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-024-02003-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-024-02003-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:74:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s00267-024-02003-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.