IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v74y2024i2d10.1007_s00267-024-01992-4.html

Using public perceptions to inform urban protected area buffer zone planning

Author

Listed:
  • Xin Wang

    (Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Department of Environmental Design)

  • Rui Wang

    (Wuhan University of Technology, School of Art and Design)

  • Xinyi Lyu

    (Huazhong Agricultural University, College of Economics and Management)

  • Hong Wu

    (The Pennsylvania State University, Department of Landscape Architecture)

Abstract

The buffer zones between urban protected areas (UPAs) and their cities play a significant role in managing and protecting UPAs. However, they are also the frontier of conflicts due to complex functionality and a large number of stakeholders. Besides ensuring the buffer zone’s function of protecting the UPA, it is also vital to understand how it can fulfill the diverse needs of multiple interest groups residing in or utilizing this area. To address the significant social science research gap in UPA buffer zone management, we establish a conceptual framework and explore how the public’s overall satisfaction with the buffer depends on five essential buffer zone qualities, namely environmental quality, connectivity, infrastructure, cultural, and visual quality. We focus on China’s Urban Scenic and Historic Areas (USHA), a major type of UPA with high cultural, social, and esthetic values. Using the buffer of Shugang-Slender West Lake Scenic and Historic Area in Yangzhou City as the case study, we conducted intercept and online surveys (n = 499), investigating the perceptions of three user groups—residents, businesses, and tourists. The results indicate high overall satisfaction for all three groups. Environmental, visual, and cultural qualities were rated higher than connectivity and infrastructure quality. Residents generally showed the highest satisfaction and tourists the lowest. For all three groups, environmental quality, connectivity, and infrastructure quality significantly influenced overall satisfaction, while cultural and visual quality did not. This suggests that the public expects the buffer zone to serve as high-quality multi-functional open spaces that enhance the quality of life while providing recreation, service, and transportation functions. Besides direct planning and management advice to China’s UPAs and other countries with similar contexts, our study offers a transferable framework for incorporating social perceptions and highlights their significance in informing the functional planning of UPA buffer zones for public welfare.

Suggested Citation

  • Xin Wang & Rui Wang & Xinyi Lyu & Hong Wu, 2024. "Using public perceptions to inform urban protected area buffer zone planning," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 74(2), pages 300-316, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:74:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-024-01992-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-024-01992-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-024-01992-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-024-01992-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:74:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-024-01992-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.