IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v74y2024i2d10.1007_s00267-024-01963-9.html

Farmers’ Willingness to Participate in a Carbon Sequestration Program – A Discrete Choice Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Julia B. Block

    (University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development)

  • Michael Danne

    (Institute of Farm Economics, Thünen Institute)

  • Oliver Mußhoff

    (University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development)

Abstract

Farmers can counteract global warming by drawing carbon dioxide from the air into agricultural soils by building up humus. Humus programs were developed to motivate farmers for even more humus formation (= carbon sequestration) through an additional financial incentive. These programs are still at an early stage of development, which is why the number of participating farmers and research work is still low. This study is the first to analyze the willingness of German farmers to participate in hypothetical humus programs. The results of a discrete choice experiment show that a (higher) threshold for the payout of the premium, regional (rather than field-specific) reference values, and the risk of repayment clearly discourage farmers from participating. Program providers must more than double the premium (set at around 240 € per hectare and 0.1% humus increase) to maintain farmers’ willingness to participate despite a payout threshold. Regional reference values and an additional premium/repayment system would lead to an increase in the premium of around 20 € per hectare in order to keep the willingness to participate at the same level. The motivation to build up humus, the desire to maximize subsidies, and a higher livestock density have a positive influence on farmers’ decision to participate. Farm size and risk attitude have an impact on farmers’ preferences for program design. The study is relevant for policymakers and non-governmental organizations concerned with carbon management, as our findings highlight pathways for efficient, targeted designs of humus programs and carbon sequestration policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia B. Block & Michael Danne & Oliver Mußhoff, 2024. "Farmers’ Willingness to Participate in a Carbon Sequestration Program – A Discrete Choice Experiment," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 74(2), pages 332-349, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:74:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-024-01963-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-024-01963-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-024-01963-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-024-01963-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:74:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-024-01963-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.