Author
Listed:
- Martina Calosi
(Research Unit of Behavioural Ecology, Ethology and Wildlife Management—Department of Life Sciences—University of Siena)
- Chiara Gabbrielli
(Research Unit of Behavioural Ecology, Ethology and Wildlife Management—Department of Life Sciences—University of Siena)
- Lorenzo Lazzeri
(Research Unit of Behavioural Ecology, Ethology and Wildlife Management—Department of Life Sciences—University of Siena)
- Niccolò Fattorini
(Research Unit of Behavioural Ecology, Ethology and Wildlife Management—Department of Life Sciences—University of Siena
National Biodiversity Future Center, NBFC)
- Gloria Cesaretti
(Research Unit of Behavioural Ecology, Ethology and Wildlife Management—Department of Life Sciences—University of Siena)
- Lucia Burrini
(Research Unit of Behavioural Ecology, Ethology and Wildlife Management—Department of Life Sciences—University of Siena)
- Ottavio Petrillo
(Research Unit of Behavioural Ecology, Ethology and Wildlife Management—Department of Life Sciences—University of Siena)
- Francesco Ferretti
(Research Unit of Behavioural Ecology, Ethology and Wildlife Management—Department of Life Sciences—University of Siena
National Biodiversity Future Center, NBFC)
Abstract
Wild ungulates can influence various trophic levels, regulating carnivore abundance and affecting habitat structure. Conservation problems can arise when high ungulate densities threaten species or habitats with conservation concern. Assessing factors influencing the intensity of their impact is important to identify appropriate measures enhancing habitat conservation. We assessed factors influencing wild boar Sus scrofa pressure on EU protected grasslands in three protected areas of central Italy, by modelling the effects of environmental variables and wild boar density on rooting activity. We seasonally estimated rooting in 126 sampling plots from spring 2019 to spring 2021, and we used faeces counts to estimate summer wild boar densities. Estimates of density and rooting varied from 3.5 to 22.2 individuals/km2 and from 1.1 to 19.2%, respectively. We detected a clear seasonal trend in rooting activity, that peaked in autumn and winter. We also found a strongly positive correlation between spring-summer rooting and summer density, across sites. Rooting intensity was negatively related to the local extent of rock cover and increased with the 1 month-cumulative rainfall, the perimeter of the grassland patch, and the forest cover around plots. These results emphasise the tendency of wild boar to exploit feeding sites in ecotonal areas, i.e., at the interface between forest and meadows, which maximises security and ease of finding food resources. Actions aiming at the protection of focal plants in grassland habitats, as well as reducing wild boar presence, are supported (e.g. fencing and/or targeting population control at vulnerable patches).
Suggested Citation
Martina Calosi & Chiara Gabbrielli & Lorenzo Lazzeri & Niccolò Fattorini & Gloria Cesaretti & Lucia Burrini & Ottavio Petrillo & Francesco Ferretti, 2024.
"Seasonal and Ecological Determinants of Wild Boar Rooting on Priority Protected Grasslands,"
Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 74(2), pages 268-281, August.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:envman:v:74:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-024-01952-y
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-024-01952-y
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:74:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-024-01952-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.