IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v73y2024i6d10.1007_s00267-024-01940-2.html

Can Exclusion of Feral Ecosystem Engineers Improve Coastal Floodplain Resilience to Climate Change? Insight from a Case Study in North East Arnhem Land, Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel R. Sloane

    (Macquarie University, School of Natural Sciences)

  • Emilie Ens

    (Macquarie University, School of Natural Sciences)

  • Yumutjin Wunungmurra

    (The Yirralka Rangers, Laynhapuy Homelands Aboriginal Corporation)

  • Lanydjana Mununggurr

    (The Yirralka Rangers, Laynhapuy Homelands Aboriginal Corporation)

  • Andrew Falk

    (The Yirralka Rangers, Laynhapuy Homelands Aboriginal Corporation)

  • Richard Wunungmurra

    (The Yirralka Rangers, Laynhapuy Homelands Aboriginal Corporation)

  • Goninyal Gumana

    (The Yirralka Rangers, Laynhapuy Homelands Aboriginal Corporation)

  • Gillian Towler

    (The Yirralka Rangers, Laynhapuy Homelands Aboriginal Corporation)

  • Dave Preece

    (The Yirralka Rangers, Laynhapuy Homelands Aboriginal Corporation)

  • The Yirralka Rangers

Abstract

Global climate change can interact with local drivers, such as ecosystem engineers, to exacerbate changes in ecosystem structure and function, with socio-ecological consequences. For regions of Indigenous interest, there may also be cultural consequences if species and areas affected are culturally significant. Here we describe a participatory approach between the Indigenous (Yolngu) Yirralka Rangers and non-Indigenous researchers that explored the interaction between sea level rise and feral ungulate ecosystem engineers on culturally significant floodplains in the Laynhapuy Indigenous Protected Area (IPA), northern Australia. A feral ungulate exclusion fence array (12 fenced and 12 unfenced plots) was stratified by elevation/salinity to disentangle the effects of salinity and ungulates on floodplain soil and vegetation. We found that exclusion of feral ungulates improved ground cover vegetation, which, according to our literature-derived ecosystem process model, may enhance soil trapping and reduce evapotranspiration to provide the antecedent conditions needed to improve floodplain resilience to sea level rise. The mid-zone of the supratidal floodplain study site was suggested as the region where the benefits of fencing were most pronounced after two years and ground cover species diversity was highest. Ongoing monitoring is required to investigate whether removal of feral ungulates can increase resilience against sea level rise and recruitment of eco-culturally significant Melaleuca species. An interview with a key Yolngu Traditional Owner of the study site demonstrated the importance and effectiveness of the partnership. Yolngu land owners and rangers were active co-researchers and will decide if, when and how to integrate results into feral ungulate management and climate adaptation responses, highlighting the importance of industry-university partnerships in maximising biocultural conservation outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel R. Sloane & Emilie Ens & Yumutjin Wunungmurra & Lanydjana Mununggurr & Andrew Falk & Richard Wunungmurra & Goninyal Gumana & Gillian Towler & Dave Preece & The Yirralka Rangers, 2024. "Can Exclusion of Feral Ecosystem Engineers Improve Coastal Floodplain Resilience to Climate Change? Insight from a Case Study in North East Arnhem Land, Australia," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 73(6), pages 1150-1166, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:73:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s00267-024-01940-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-024-01940-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-024-01940-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-024-01940-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:73:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s00267-024-01940-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.