IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v70y2022i3d10.1007_s00267-022-01663-2.html

Influencing Factors of Stereotypes on Wastewater Treatment Plants- Case Study of 9 Wastewater Treatment Plants in Xi’an, China

Author

Listed:
  • Hanliang Fu

    (Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, School of Management
    Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Laboratory of Neuromanagement in Engineering)

  • Jiachen Niu

    (Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, School of Management
    Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Laboratory of Neuromanagement in Engineering)

  • Zhifang Wu

    (University of South Australia, Business)

  • Pengdong Xue

    (Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, School of Management
    Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Laboratory of Neuromanagement in Engineering)

  • Meng Sun

    (Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, School of Management
    Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Laboratory of Neuromanagement in Engineering)

  • Hong Zhu

    (Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, School of Management
    Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Laboratory of Neuromanagement in Engineering)

  • Baoquan Cheng

    (Central South University, School of Civil Engineering)

Abstract

As an indispensable part of cities, wastewater treatment plants play an important role in environmental protection and urbanization. However, the promotion of wastewater treatment plants has been consistently hindered by residents’ negative stereotypes and rejections, which is called “Not-In-My-Back-Yard” (NIMBY) effect. This study collected the first-hand data with the residents residing within 3 kilometers of 9 wastewater treatment plants in Xi’an, China through a survey. Keyword co-occurrence network analysis was conducted and the results illustrate that residents have stereotypes toward wastewater treatment plants. There are two types of residents’ stereotypes toward wastewater treatment plants: positive and negative. The positive stereotypes of wastewater treatment plants in turn can be subdivided into the three categories of treatment technologies, treatment results, and social impacts. But the negative stereotypes didn’t demonstrate meaningful categories. We also tried to identify the influencing factors that cause residents’ stereotypes. The distance from residents’ residence to the wastewater treatment plants has impacts on the stereotypes of residents’ who reside within 1000 meters of the wastewater treatment plant: the farther from the wastewater treatment plants their residence is, the more positive their stereotypes are. We also found that the more educated the participants are, the more positive stereotypes of wastewater treatment plants they have. Moreover, residents’ stereotypes toward wastewater treatment plants are more influenced by formal education. Non-formal education and informal learning probably have less influence on the promotion of wastewater treatment plants. Therefore, we propose to incorporate environmental education for sustainable development into formal education to increase residents’ acceptance of wastewater treatment plants.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanliang Fu & Jiachen Niu & Zhifang Wu & Pengdong Xue & Meng Sun & Hong Zhu & Baoquan Cheng, 2022. "Influencing Factors of Stereotypes on Wastewater Treatment Plants- Case Study of 9 Wastewater Treatment Plants in Xi’an, China," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 70(3), pages 526-535, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:70:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s00267-022-01663-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-022-01663-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-022-01663-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-022-01663-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:70:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s00267-022-01663-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.