IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v70y2022i2d10.1007_s00267-022-01649-0.html

Targeting Sagebrush (Artemisia Spp.) Restoration Following Wildfire with Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus Urophasianus) Nest Selection and Survival Models

Author

Listed:
  • Cali L. Roth

    (Western Ecological Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey)

  • Shawn T. O’Neil

    (Western Ecological Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey)

  • Peter S. Coates

    (Western Ecological Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey)

  • Mark A. Ricca

    (Western Ecological Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey)

  • David A. Pyke

    (Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey)

  • Cameron L. Aldridge

    (Fort Collins Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey)

  • Julie A. Heinrichs

    (Colorado State University, Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, in cooperation with U.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center)

  • Shawn P. Espinosa

    (Nevada Department of Wildlife)

  • David J. Delehanty

    (Idaho State University, Department of Biological Sciences)

Abstract

Unprecedented conservation efforts for sagebrush (Artemisia spp.) ecosystems across the western United States have been catalyzed by risks from escalated wildfire activity that reduces habitat for sagebrush-obligate species such as Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus). However, post-fire restoration is challenged by spatial variation in ecosystem processes influencing resilience to disturbance and resistance to non-native invasive species, and spatial and temporal lags between slower sagebrush recovery processes and faster demographic responses of sage-grouse to loss of important habitat. Decision-support frameworks that account for these factors can help users strategically apply restoration efforts by predicting short and long-term ecological benefits of actions. Here, we developed a framework that strategically targets burned areas for restoration actions (e.g., seeding or planting sagebrush) that have the greatest potential to positively benefit sage-grouse populations through time. Specifically, we estimated sagebrush recovery following wildfire and risk of non-native annual grass invasion under four scenarios: passive recovery, grazing exclusion, active restoration with seeding, and active restoration with seedling transplants. We then applied spatial predictions of integrated nest site selection and survival models before wildfire, immediately following wildfire, and at 30 and 50 years post-wildfire based on each restoration scenario and measured changes in habitat. Application of this framework coupled with strategic planting designs aimed at developing patches of nesting habitat may help increase operational resilience for fire-impacted sagebrush ecosystems.

Suggested Citation

  • Cali L. Roth & Shawn T. O’Neil & Peter S. Coates & Mark A. Ricca & David A. Pyke & Cameron L. Aldridge & Julie A. Heinrichs & Shawn P. Espinosa & David J. Delehanty, 2022. "Targeting Sagebrush (Artemisia Spp.) Restoration Following Wildfire with Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus Urophasianus) Nest Selection and Survival Models," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 70(2), pages 288-306, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:70:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-022-01649-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-022-01649-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-022-01649-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-022-01649-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:70:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-022-01649-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.