Author
Listed:
- Temesgen Gashaw
(Bahir Dar University, Department of Natural Resource Management, College of Agriculture and Environmental Science)
- Yihun T. Dile
(Texas A&M University, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences)
- Abeyou W. Worqlul
(Blackland Research and Extension Center, Texas A & M University)
- Amare Bantider
(Addis Ababa University, Water and Land Resource Center
Addis Ababa University, College of Development Studies)
- Gete Zeleke
(Addis Ababa University, Water and Land Resource Center)
- Woldeamlak Bewket
(Addis Ababa University, Water and Land Resource Center
Addis Ababa University, Department of Geography and Environmental Studies)
- Tena Alamirew
(Addis Ababa University, Water and Land Resource Center
Ethiopiann Institute of Water Resources, Addis Ababa University)
Abstract
This study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of best management practices (BMPs) to reduce soil erosion in Gumara watershed of the Abbay (Upper Blue Nile) Basin using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model. The model was calibrated (1995–2002) and validated (2003–2007) using the SWAT-CUP based on observed streamflow and sediment yield data at the watershed outlet. The study evaluated four individual BMP Scenarios; namely, filter strips (FS), stone/soil bunds (SSB), grassed waterways (GW) and reforestation of croplands (RC), and three blended BMP Scenarios, which combines individual BMPS of FS and RC (FS & RC), GW and RC (GW & RC), and SSB and GW (SSB & GW). Mean annual sediment yield at the baseline conditions was estimated at 19.7 t ha−1yr−1, which was reduced by 13.7, 30.5, 16.2 and 25.9% in the FS, SSB, GW, and RC Scenarios, respectively at the watershed scale. The highest reduction efficiency of 34% was achieved through the implementations of the SSB & GW Scenario. The GW & RC, and FS & RC Scenarios reduced the baseline sediment yield by 32% and 29.9%, respectively. The study therefore concluded that the combined Scenarios mainly SSB & GW, and GW & RC can be applied to reduce the high soil erosion in the Gumera watershed, and similar agro-ecological watersheds in Ethiopia. In cases where applying the combined scenarios is not possible, the SSB Scenario can yield significant soil erosion reduction.
Suggested Citation
Temesgen Gashaw & Yihun T. Dile & Abeyou W. Worqlul & Amare Bantider & Gete Zeleke & Woldeamlak Bewket & Tena Alamirew, 2021.
"Evaluating the Effectiveness of Best Management Practices On Soil Erosion Reduction Using the SWAT Model: for the Case of Gumara Watershed, Abbay (Upper Blue Nile) Basin,"
Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 68(2), pages 240-261, August.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:envman:v:68:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-021-01492-9
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-021-01492-9
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:68:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-021-01492-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.