IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v66y2020i5d10.1007_s00267-020-01348-8.html

The Effects of Public Participation on Multi-Level Water Governance, Lessons from Uganda

Author

Listed:
  • Emeline Hassenforder

    (G-EAU, INRAE, Cirad, AgroParisTech, IRD, Montpellier SupAgro, Univ Montpellier)

  • Olivier Barreteau

    (G-EAU, INRAE, Cirad, AgroParisTech, IRD, Montpellier SupAgro, Univ Montpellier)

  • Katherine Anne Daniell

    (Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University (ANU))

  • Nils Ferrand

    (G-EAU, INRAE, Cirad, AgroParisTech, IRD, Montpellier SupAgro, Univ Montpellier)

  • Clovis Kabaseke

    (Mountains of the Moon University (MMU))

  • Moses Muhumuza

    (Mountains of the Moon University (MMU))

  • Thaddeo Tibasiima

    (University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Division of Organic Farming (IFÖL), Department of Sustainable Agricultural Systems)

Abstract

Water governance occurs at multiple levels, from the local to the supra-national, which are often highly fragmented. The interconnected nature of water requires interactions among these multiple governance levels. Public participation may foster such interactions. Thus, many water management reforms involved decentralization and public participation worldwide over the last decades. Yet, it is not demonstrated how these reforms may improve water resources sustainability. Their analysis in the literature does not show concretely how interactions among multiple levels materialize and are influenced by participation. As such, the question addressed is how interactions among multiple levels of water governance manifest over time in a participatory intervention. Using a case study in the Rwenzori region in Uganda, this article compares the multi-level interactions before and during a participatory process. The latter has been purposely implemented to bridge gaps between local and provincial levels through a participatory planning process centred on the provincial level. Four types of flows were analyzed: information and knowledge, hydrosocial, financial and human. Our analysis shows that using artefacts like the role-playing game and planning matrix fostered bi-directional information and knowledge flows. Hydrosocial flows did not change in depth but the legitimacy of the two organizations implementing the participatory process was reinforced. Project financial flows were injected through a provincial academic institution, who is not a regular budget recipient. They were therefore superimposed on existing budgeting process. We conclude by providing suggestions for the engineering of participatory processes in order to foster more collaborative and effective multi-level water governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Emeline Hassenforder & Olivier Barreteau & Katherine Anne Daniell & Nils Ferrand & Clovis Kabaseke & Moses Muhumuza & Thaddeo Tibasiima, 2020. "The Effects of Public Participation on Multi-Level Water Governance, Lessons from Uganda," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 66(5), pages 770-784, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:66:y:2020:i:5:d:10.1007_s00267-020-01348-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-020-01348-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-020-01348-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-020-01348-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:66:y:2020:i:5:d:10.1007_s00267-020-01348-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.