IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v63y2019i5d10.1007_s00267-019-01141-2.html

Integration of social and ecological sciences for natural resource decision making: challenges and opportunities

Author

Listed:
  • Kelly F. Robinson

    (Cornell University, Department of Natural Resources, New York Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit
    Michigan State University, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Quantitative Fisheries Center)

  • Angela K. Fuller

    (Cornell University, Department of Natural Resources, U.S. Geological Survey, New York Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit)

  • Richard C. Stedman

    (Cornell University, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell Center for Conservation Social Sciences)

  • William F. Siemer

    (Cornell University, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell Center for Conservation Social Sciences)

  • Daniel J. Decker

    (Cornell University, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell Center for Conservation Social Sciences)

Abstract

The last 25 years have witnessed growing recognition that natural resource management decisions depend as much on understanding humans and their social interactions as on understanding the interactions between non-human organisms and their environment. Decision science provides a framework for integrating ecological and social factors into a decision, but challenges to integration remain. The decision-analytic framework elicits values and preferences to help articulate objectives, and then evaluates the outcomes of alternative management actions to achieve these objectives. Integrating social science into these steps can be hindered by failing to include social scientists as more than stakeholder-process facilitators, assuming that specific decision-analytic skills are commonplace for social scientists, misperceptions of social data as inherently qualitative, timescale mismatches for iterating through decision analysis and collecting relevant social data, difficulties in predicting human behavior, and failures of institutions to recognize the importance of this integration. We engage these challenges, and suggest solutions to them, helping move forward the integration of social and biological/ecological knowledge and considerations in decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Kelly F. Robinson & Angela K. Fuller & Richard C. Stedman & William F. Siemer & Daniel J. Decker, 2019. "Integration of social and ecological sciences for natural resource decision making: challenges and opportunities," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 63(5), pages 565-573, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:63:y:2019:i:5:d:10.1007_s00267-019-01141-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-019-01141-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-019-01141-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-019-01141-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:63:y:2019:i:5:d:10.1007_s00267-019-01141-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.