IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v63y2019i2d10.1007_s00267-018-1127-1.html

Young Forest Conservation Incentive Programs: Explaining Re-Enrollment and Post-program Persistence

Author

Listed:
  • Seth H. Lutter

    (Virginia Tech, Department of Fish & Wildlife Conservation)

  • Ashley A. Dayer

    (Virginia Tech, Department of Fish & Wildlife Conservation)

  • Jeffery L. Larkin

    (Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Department of Biology
    American Bird Conservancy)

Abstract

Environmental conservation actions conducted by private landowners are critically important for conservation efforts worldwide. Incentive programs are used to engage landowners in voluntary conservation, but outcomes after landowners exit these programs are poorly understood. Previous research identified several pathways, including landowner motivations, cognitions, and resources, which could sustain or undermine continued conservation management behavior after incentive program participation. We tested the utility of these pathways for explaining management intentions of participants in U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) young forest habitat conservation programs in the eastern United States. We conducted a telephone survey of enrolled landowners in the programs from January to May 2017 (n = 102). We compared candidate multiple regression models to determine variables explaining landowner intentions to re-enroll in young forest programs or to persist with management without further cost-share. We found intentions to re-enroll in NRCS young forest programs were highest among landowners with high agency trust, and for whom cost-share, environmental concerns, and hunting were important motivations. Management persistence intentions were highest for group landowners (e.g., hunting clubs and nonprofits), landowners motivated by environmental concerns, and those less motivated by cost-share. Our results suggest that fostering trust through positive program experiences and recruiting landowners with supportive motivations and resources may encourage sustained young forest management. Differences in variables explaining program re-enrollment and management persistence in this study highlight the importance of considering these outcomes separately for conservation programs widely.

Suggested Citation

  • Seth H. Lutter & Ashley A. Dayer & Jeffery L. Larkin, 2019. "Young Forest Conservation Incentive Programs: Explaining Re-Enrollment and Post-program Persistence," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 63(2), pages 270-281, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:63:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-018-1127-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-018-1127-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-018-1127-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-018-1127-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:63:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-018-1127-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.