Author
Listed:
- Susan A Schroeder
(University of Minnesota, Minnesota Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit)
- David C Fulton
(University of Minnesota, U.S. Geological Survey, Minnesota Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit)
- Eric Altena
(Minnesota Department of Natural Resources)
- Heather Baird
(Minnesota Department of Natural Resources)
- Douglas Dieterman
(Minnesota Department of Natural Resources)
- Martin Jennings
(Minnesota Department of Natural Resources)
Abstract
Resource managers benefit from knowledge of angler support for fisheries management strategies. Factors including angler values (protection, utilitarian, and dominance), involvement (attraction, centrality, social, identity affirmation, and expression), catch-related motivations (catching some, many, and big fish, and keeping fish), satisfaction, agency trust, and demographics may relate to fisheries management preferences. Using results from a mail survey of Minnesota resident anglers, we explored how these factors were related to budget support for fish stocking relative to habitat protection/restoration. Results suggest that values, angler involvement, catch orientation, satisfaction, total and recent years fishing, age, and education influence relative support for stocking versus habitat protection/restoration. Utilitarian values, angling centrality, an orientation to catch many fish, satisfaction with the number of fish caught, number of recent years fishing, and age positively related to support for stocking over habitat management, while protection values, attraction to angling, total years fishing, and education level were negatively related to relative support for stocking.
Suggested Citation
Susan A Schroeder & David C Fulton & Eric Altena & Heather Baird & Douglas Dieterman & Martin Jennings, 2018.
"The Influence of Angler Values, Involvement, Catch Orientation, Satisfaction, Agency Trust, and Demographics on Support for Habitat Protection and Restoration Versus Stocking in Publicly Managed Waters,"
Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 665-677, October.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:envman:v:62:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s00267-018-1067-9
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-018-1067-9
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:62:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s00267-018-1067-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.