IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v62y2018i3d10.1007_s00267-018-1068-8.html

Perception of Urban Environmental Risks and the Effects of Urban Green Infrastructures (UGIs) on Human Well-being in Four Public Green Spaces of Guangzhou, China

Author

Listed:
  • Junya Duan

    (Sun Yat-sen University, School of Environmental Science and Engineering
    Wageningen University, Environmental Systems Analysis group)

  • Yafei Wang

    (Sun Yat-sen University, School of Environmental Science and Engineering
    Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Environmental Pollution Control and Remediation Technology)

  • Chen Fan

    (Sun Yat-sen University, School of Environmental Science and Engineering
    Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Environmental Pollution Control and Remediation Technology)

  • Beicheng Xia

    (Sun Yat-sen University, School of Environmental Science and Engineering
    Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Environmental Pollution Control and Remediation Technology)

  • Rudolf de Groot

    (Wageningen University, Environmental Systems Analysis group)

Abstract

Cities face many challenging environmental problems that affect human well-being. Environmental risks can be reduced by Urban Green Infrastructures (UGIs). The effects of UGIs on the urban environment have been widely studied, but less attention has been given to the public perception of these effects. This paper presents the results of a study in Guangzhou, China, on UGI users’ perceptions of these effects and their relationship with sociodemographic variables. A questionnaire survey was conducted in four public green spaces. Descriptive statistics, a binary logistic regression model and cross-tabulation analysis were applied on the data from 396 valid questionnaires. The results show that UGI users were more concerned about poor air quality and high temperature than about flooding events. Their awareness of environmental risks was partly in accordance with official records. Regarding the perception of the impacts of environmental risks on human well-being, elderly and female respondents with higher education levels were the most sensitive to these impacts. The respondents’ perceptions of these impacts differed among the different green spaces. The effects of UGIs were well perceived and directly observed by the UGI users, but were not significantly influenced by most sociodemographic variables. Moreover, tourists had a lower perception of the impacts of environmental risks and the effects of UGI than residents did. This study provides strong support for UGIs as an effective tool to mitigate environmental risks. Local governments should consider the role of UGIs in environmental risk mitigation and human well-being with regard to urban planning and policy making.

Suggested Citation

  • Junya Duan & Yafei Wang & Chen Fan & Beicheng Xia & Rudolf de Groot, 2018. "Perception of Urban Environmental Risks and the Effects of Urban Green Infrastructures (UGIs) on Human Well-being in Four Public Green Spaces of Guangzhou, China," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 62(3), pages 500-517, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:62:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s00267-018-1068-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-018-1068-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-018-1068-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-018-1068-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:62:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s00267-018-1068-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.