IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v62y2018i3d10.1007_s00267-018-1063-0.html

Motorized Activity on Legacy Seismic Lines: A Predictive Modeling Approach to Prioritize Restoration Efforts

Author

Listed:
  • M. L. Hornseth

    (Borealis Ecology
    fRI Research, Caribou Program)

  • K. E. Pigeon

    (fRI Research, Caribou Program)

  • D. MacNearney

    (fRI Research, Caribou Program
    National Wildlife Research Centre, Wildlife Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada)

  • T. A. Larsen

    (Grizzly Bear Program fRI Research)

  • G. Stenhouse

    (Grizzly Bear Program fRI Research)

  • J. Cranston

    (University of Saskatchewan, Canadian Wildlife Health Cooperative, Western College of Veterinary Medicine
    Biological Sciences Building University of Alberta, Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute)

  • L. Finnegan

    (fRI Research, Caribou Program)

Abstract

Natural regeneration of seismic lines, cleared for hydrocarbon exploration, is slow and often hindered by vegetation damage, soil compaction, and motorized human activity. There is an extensive network of seismic lines in western Canada which is known to impact forest ecosystems, and seismic lines have been linked to declines in woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou). Seismic line restoration is costly, but necessary for caribou conservation to reduce cumulative disturbance. Understanding where motorized activity may be impeding regeneration of seismic lines will aid in prioritizing restoration. Our study area in west-central Alberta, encompassed five caribou ranges where restoration is required under federal species at risk recovery strategies, hence prioritizing seismic lines for restoration is of immediate conservation value. To understand patterns of motorized activity on seismic lines, we evaluated five a priori hypotheses using a predictive modeling framework and Geographic Information System variables across three landscapes in the foothills and northern boreal regions of Alberta. In the northern boreal landscape, motorized activity was most common in dry areas with a large industrial footprint. In highly disturbed areas of the foothills, motorized activity on seismic lines increased with low vegetation heights, relatively dry soils, and further from forest cutblocks, while in less disturbed areas of the foothills, motorized activity on seismic lines decreased proportional to seismic line density, slope steepness, and white-tailed deer abundance, and increased proportional with distance to roads. We generated predictive maps of high motorized activity, identifying 21,777 km of seismic lines where active restoration could expedite forest regeneration.

Suggested Citation

  • M. L. Hornseth & K. E. Pigeon & D. MacNearney & T. A. Larsen & G. Stenhouse & J. Cranston & L. Finnegan, 2018. "Motorized Activity on Legacy Seismic Lines: A Predictive Modeling Approach to Prioritize Restoration Efforts," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 62(3), pages 595-607, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:62:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s00267-018-1063-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-018-1063-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-018-1063-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-018-1063-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:62:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s00267-018-1063-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.