IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v62y2018i3d10.1007_s00267-018-1061-2.html

What are the Conditions of Riparian Ecosystems? Identifying Impaired Floodplain Ecosystems across the Western U.S. Using the Riparian Condition Assessment (RCA) Tool

Author

Listed:
  • William W. Macfarlane

    (Utah State University, Department of Watershed Sciences)

  • Jordan T. Gilbert

    (Utah State University, Department of Watershed Sciences)

  • Joshua D. Gilbert

    (Utah State University, Department of Watershed Sciences)

  • William C. Saunders

    (Utah State University, Department of Watershed Sciences
    Eco Logical Research, Inc.)

  • Nate Hough-Snee

    (Meadow Run Environmental, LLC)

  • Chalese Hafen

    (Utah State University, Department of Watershed Sciences)

  • Joseph M. Wheaton

    (Utah State University, Department of Watershed Sciences
    Anabranch Solutions, LLC)

  • Stephen N. Bennett

    (Utah State University, Department of Watershed Sciences
    Eco Logical Research, Inc.
    Anabranch Solutions, LLC)

Abstract

Environmental stressors associated with human land and water-use activities have degraded many riparian ecosystems across the western United States. These stressors include (i) the widespread expansion of invasive plant species that displace native vegetation and exacerbate streamflow and sediment regime alteration; (ii) agricultural and urban development in valley bottoms that decouple streams and rivers from their floodplains and reduce instream wood recruitment and retention; and (iii) flow modification that reduces water quantity and quality, degrading aquatic habitats. Here we apply a novel drainage network model to assess the impacts of multiple stressors on reach-scale riparian condition across two large U.S. regions. In this application, we performed a riparian condition assessment evaluating three dominant stressors: (1) riparian vegetation departure from historical condition; (2) land-use intensity within valley bottoms; and (3) floodplain fragmentation caused by infrastructure within valley bottoms, combining these stressors in a fuzzy inference system. We used freely available, geospatial data to estimate reach-scale (500 m) riparian condition for 52,800 km of perennial streams and rivers, 25,600 km in Utah, and 27,200 km in 12 watersheds of the interior Columbia River Basin (CRB). Model outputs showed that riparian condition has been at least moderately impaired across ≈70% of the streams and rivers in Utah and ≈49% in the CRB. We found 84% agreement (Cohen’s ĸ = 0.79) between modeled reaches and field plots, indicating that modeled riparian condition reasonably approximates on-the-ground conditions. Our approach to assessing riparian condition can be used to prioritize watershed-scale floodplain conservation and restoration by providing network-scale data on the extent and severity of riparian degradation. The approach that we applied here is flexible and can be expanded to run with additional riparian stressor data and/or finer resolution input data.

Suggested Citation

  • William W. Macfarlane & Jordan T. Gilbert & Joshua D. Gilbert & William C. Saunders & Nate Hough-Snee & Chalese Hafen & Joseph M. Wheaton & Stephen N. Bennett, 2018. "What are the Conditions of Riparian Ecosystems? Identifying Impaired Floodplain Ecosystems across the Western U.S. Using the Riparian Condition Assessment (RCA) Tool," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 62(3), pages 548-570, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:62:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s00267-018-1061-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-018-1061-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-018-1061-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-018-1061-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:62:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s00267-018-1061-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.