IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v62y2018i2d10.1007_s00267-018-1037-2.html

On Abandoning Hypothesis Testing in Environmental Standard Compliance Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Song S. Qian

    (The University of Toledo, Department of Environmental Sciences)

  • Robert J. Miltner

    (Ohio Environmental Protection Agency)

Abstract

We use basic characteristics of statistical significance test to argue the abandonment of hypothesis testing in environmental standard (or criterion) compliance assessment. The typical sample size used for environmental assessment is small, and the natural variation of many water quality constituent concentrations is high. These conditions lead to low statistical power of the hypothesis tests used in the assessment process. As a result, using hypothesis testing is often inefficient in detecting noncompliance. When a noncompliance is detected, it is frequently due to sampling or other types of error. We illustrate the problems using two examples, through which we argue that these problems cannot be resolved under the current practice of assessing compliance one water at a time. We recommend that the hypothesis testing framework be replaced by a statistical estimation approach, which can more effectively leverage information from assessments on similar waters using a probabilistic assessment approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Song S. Qian & Robert J. Miltner, 2018. "On Abandoning Hypothesis Testing in Environmental Standard Compliance Assessment," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 62(2), pages 183-189, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:62:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-018-1037-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-018-1037-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-018-1037-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-018-1037-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:62:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-018-1037-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.