Author
Listed:
- Giuseppe Cardellini
(University of Leuven (KU Leuven), Division Forest, Nature and Landscape
Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Institute for Environmental Management and Land Use Planning (IGEAT))
- Tatiana Valada
(University of Leuven (KU Leuven), Division Forest, Nature and Landscape)
- Claire Cornillier
(Technological Institute, Furniture, Environment, Economy, Primary Processing and Supply (FCBA))
- Estelle Vial
(Technological Institute, Furniture, Environment, Economy, Primary Processing and Supply (FCBA))
- Marian Dragoi
(Universitatea Stefan del Mare, Faculty of Forestry)
- Venceslas Goudiaby
(Wageningen University & Research, Forest Ecology and Forest Management Group)
- Volker Mues
(University Hamburg, Centre for Wood Science, World Forestry)
- Bruno Lasserre
(University of Molise, Department of Biosciences and Territory)
- Arkadiusz Gruchala
(Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Department of Forest Economics, Faculty of Forestry)
- Per Kristian Rørstad
(Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management)
- Mathias Neumann
(University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Department of Forest and Soil Sciences, Institute of Silviculture)
- Miroslav Svoboda
(Czech University of Life Sciences, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences)
- Risto Sirgmets
(Estonian University of Life Sciences, Institute of Forestry and Rural Engineering)
- Olli-Pekka Näsärö
(University of Helsinki, Department of Forest Sciences)
- Frits Mohren
(Wageningen University & Research, Forest Ecology and Forest Management Group)
- Wouter M. J. Achten
(Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Institute for Environmental Management and Land Use Planning (IGEAT))
- Liesbet Vranken
(University of Leuven (KU Leuven), Division Forest, Nature and Landscape)
- Bart Muys
(University of Leuven (KU Leuven), Division Forest, Nature and Landscape)
Abstract
Life cycle assessment (LCA) has become a common methodology to analyze environmental impacts of forestry systems. Although LCA has been widely applied to forestry since the 90s, the LCAs are still often based on generic Life Cycle Inventory (LCI). With the purpose of improving LCA practices in the forestry sector, we developed a European Life Cycle Inventory of Forestry Operations (EFO-LCI) and analyzed the available information to check if within the European forestry sector national differences really exist. We classified the European forests on the basis of “Forest Units” (combinations of tree species and silvicultural practices). For each Forest Unit, we constructed the LCI of their forest management practices on the basis of a questionnaire filled out by national silvicultural experts. We analyzed the data reported to evaluate how they vary over Europe and how they affect LCA results and made freely available the inventory data collected for future use. The study shows important variability in rotation length, type of regeneration, amount and assortments of wood products harvested, and machinery used due to the differences in management practices. The existing variability on these activities sensibly affect LCA results of forestry practices and raw wood production. Although it is practically unfeasible to collect site-specific data for all the LCAs involving forest-based products, the use of less generic LCI data of forestry practice is desirable to improve the reliability of the studies. With the release of EFO-LCI we made a step toward the construction of regionalized LCI for the European forestry sector.
Suggested Citation
Giuseppe Cardellini & Tatiana Valada & Claire Cornillier & Estelle Vial & Marian Dragoi & Venceslas Goudiaby & Volker Mues & Bruno Lasserre & Arkadiusz Gruchala & Per Kristian Rørstad & Mathias Neuman, 2018.
"EFO-LCI: A New Life Cycle Inventory Database of Forestry Operations in Europe,"
Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 61(6), pages 1031-1047, June.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:envman:v:61:y:2018:i:6:d:10.1007_s00267-018-1024-7
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-018-1024-7
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:61:y:2018:i:6:d:10.1007_s00267-018-1024-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.