IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v61y2018i3d10.1007_s00267-017-0850-3.html

A Risk-Based Ecohydrological Approach to Assessing Environmental Flow Regimes

Author

Listed:
  • Glenn B. Mcgregor

    (Queensland Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation, GPO Box 5078)

  • Jonathan C. Marshall

    (Queensland Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation, GPO Box 5078)

  • Jaye S. Lobegeiger

    (Queensland Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation, GPO Box 5078)

  • Dean Holloway

    (Queensland Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation, GPO Box 5078)

  • Norbert Menke

    (Queensland Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation, GPO Box 5078)

  • Julie Coysh

    (Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Mines)

Abstract

For several decades there has been recognition that water resource development alters river flow regimes and impacts ecosystem values. Determining strategies to protect or restore flow regimes to achieve ecological outcomes is a focus of water policy and legislation in many parts of the world. However, consideration of existing environmental flow assessment approaches for application in Queensland identified deficiencies precluding their adoption. Firstly, in managing flows and using ecosystem condition as an indicator of effectiveness, many approaches ignore the fact that river ecosystems are subjected to threatening processes other than flow regime alteration. Secondly, many focus on providing flows for responses without considering how often they are necessary to sustain ecological values in the long-term. Finally, few consider requirements at spatial-scales relevant to the desired outcomes, with frequent focus on individual places rather than the regions supporting sustainability. Consequently, we developed a risk-based ecohydrological approach that identifies ecosystem values linked to desired ecological outcomes, is sensitive to flow alteration and uses indicators of broader ecosystem requirements. Monitoring and research is undertaken to quantify flow-dependencies and ecological modelling is used to quantify flow-related ecological responses over an historical flow period. The relative risk from different flow management scenarios can be evaluated at relevant spatial-scales. This overcomes the deficiencies identified above and provides a robust and useful foundation upon which to build the information needed to support water planning decisions. Application of the risk assessment approach is illustrated here by two case studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Glenn B. Mcgregor & Jonathan C. Marshall & Jaye S. Lobegeiger & Dean Holloway & Norbert Menke & Julie Coysh, 2018. "A Risk-Based Ecohydrological Approach to Assessing Environmental Flow Regimes," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 61(3), pages 358-374, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:61:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s00267-017-0850-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-017-0850-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-017-0850-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-017-0850-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:61:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s00267-017-0850-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.