Author
Listed:
- Arne Arnberger
(University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Institute of Landscape Development, Recreation and Conservation Planning)
- Martin Ebenberger
(University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Institute of Landscape Development, Recreation and Conservation Planning)
- Ingrid E. Schneider
(University of Minnesota)
- Stuart Cottrell
(Colorado State University, Human Dimensions of Natural Resources)
- Alexander C. Schlueter
(University of Minnesota)
- Eick von Ruschkowski
(Alfred Toepfer Academy for Nature Conservation)
- Robert C. Venette
(University of Minnesota
Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service)
- Stephanie A. Snyder
(Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service)
- Paul H. Gobster
(Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service)
Abstract
Extensive outbreaks of tree-killing insects are increasing across forests in Europe and North America due to climate change and other factors. Yet, little recent research examines visitor response to visual changes in conifer forest recreation settings resulting from forest insect infestations, how visitors weigh trade-offs between physical and social forest environment factors, or how visitor preferences might differ by nationality. This study explored forest visitor preferences with a discrete choice experiment that photographically simulated conifer forest stands with varying levels of bark beetle outbreaks, forest and visitor management practices, and visitor use levels and compositions. On-site surveys were conducted with visitors to State Forest State Park in Colorado (n = 200), Lake Bemidji State Park in Minnesota (n = 228), and Harz National Park in Germany (n = 208). Results revealed that the condition of the immediate forest surrounding was the most important variable influencing visitors’ landscape preferences. Visitors preferred healthy mature forest stands and disliked forests with substantial dead wood. The number of visitors was the most important social factor influencing visitor landscape preferences. Differences in the influence of physical and social factors on visual preferences existed between study sites. Findings suggest that both visual forest conditions and visitor use management are important concerns in addressing landscape preferences for beetle-impacted forest recreation areas.
Suggested Citation
Arne Arnberger & Martin Ebenberger & Ingrid E. Schneider & Stuart Cottrell & Alexander C. Schlueter & Eick von Ruschkowski & Robert C. Venette & Stephanie A. Snyder & Paul H. Gobster, 2018.
"Visitor Preferences for Visual Changes in Bark Beetle-Impacted Forest Recreation Settings in the United States and Germany,"
Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 61(2), pages 209-223, February.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:envman:v:61:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-017-0975-4
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-017-0975-4
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:61:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-017-0975-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.