IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v60y2017i6d10.1007_s00267-017-0938-9.html

Do Riparian Buffers Protect Stream Invertebrate Communities in South American Atlantic Forest Agricultural Areas?

Author

Listed:
  • L. Hunt

    (University of California, Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management)

  • N. Marrochi

    (ILPLA (CONICET-CCT La Plata)—UNLP Instituto de Limnología “Dr. Raúl. A. Ringuelet”)

  • C. Bonetto

    (ILPLA (CONICET-CCT La Plata)—UNLP Instituto de Limnología “Dr. Raúl. A. Ringuelet”)

  • M. Liess

    (Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Department System-Ecotoxicology)

  • D. F. Buss

    (Laboratório de Avaliação e Promoção da Saúde Ambiental, IOC, FIOCRUZ)

  • C. Vieira da Silva

    (Instituto de Biociências,Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Departamento de Zoologia)

  • M.-C. Chiu

    (University of California, Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management)

  • V. H. Resh

    (University of California, Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management)

Abstract

We investigated the influence and relative importance of insecticides and other agricultural stressors in determining variability in invertebrate communities in small streams in intensive soy-production regions of Brazil and Paraguay. In Paraguay we sampled 17 sites on tributaries of the Pirapó River in the state of Itapúa and in Brazil we sampled 18 sites on tributaries of the San Francisco River in the state of Paraná. The riparian buffer zones generally contained native Atlantic forest remnants and/or introduced tree species at various stages of growth. In Brazil the stream buffer width was negatively correlated with sediment insecticide concentrations and buffer width was found to have moderate importance in mitigating effects on some sensitive taxa such as mayflies. However, in both regions insecticides had low relative importance in explaining variability in invertebrate communities, while various habitat parameters were more important. In Brazil, the percent coverage of soft depositional sediment in streams was the most important agriculture-related explanatory variable, and the overall stream-habitat score was the most important variable in Paraguay streams. Paraguay and Brazil both have laws requiring forested riparian buffers. The ample forested riparian buffer zones typical of streams in these regions are likely to have mitigated the effects of pesticides on stream invertebrate communities. This study provides evidence that riparian buffer regulations in the Atlantic Forest region are protecting stream ecosystems from pesticides and other agricultural stressors. Further studies are needed to determine the minimum buffer widths necessary to achieve optimal protection.

Suggested Citation

  • L. Hunt & N. Marrochi & C. Bonetto & M. Liess & D. F. Buss & C. Vieira da Silva & M.-C. Chiu & V. H. Resh, 2017. "Do Riparian Buffers Protect Stream Invertebrate Communities in South American Atlantic Forest Agricultural Areas?," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 60(6), pages 1155-1170, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:60:y:2017:i:6:d:10.1007_s00267-017-0938-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-017-0938-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-017-0938-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-017-0938-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:60:y:2017:i:6:d:10.1007_s00267-017-0938-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.