IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v60y2017i4d10.1007_s00267-017-0903-7.html

Participative Spatial Scenario Analysis for Alpine Ecosystems

Author

Listed:
  • Marina Kohler

    (University of Innsbruck, Institute of Ecology)

  • Rike Stotten

    (University of Innsbruck, Department of Sociology, Mountain Agricultural Research Centre)

  • Melanie Steinbacher

    (LEADERRegion Kufstein und Umgebung—Untere Schranne—Kaiserwinkl)

  • Georg Leitinger

    (University of Innsbruck, Institute of Ecology
    EURAC Research, Institute for Alpine Environment)

  • Erich Tasser

    (EURAC Research, Institute for Alpine Environment)

  • Uta Schirpke

    (University of Innsbruck, Institute of Ecology
    EURAC Research, Institute for Alpine Environment)

  • Ulrike Tappeiner

    (University of Innsbruck, Institute of Ecology
    EURAC Research, Institute for Alpine Environment)

  • Markus Schermer

    (University of Innsbruck, Department of Sociology, Mountain Agricultural Research Centre)

Abstract

Land use and land cover patterns are shaped by the interplay of human and ecological processes. Thus, heterogeneous cultural landscapes have developed, delivering multiple ecosystem services. To guarantee human well-being, the development of land use types has to be evaluated. Scenario development and land use and land cover change models are well-known tools for assessing future landscape changes. However, as social and ecological systems are inextricably linked, land use-related management decisions are difficult to identify. The concept of social-ecological resilience can thereby provide a framework for understanding complex interlinkages on multiple scales and from different disciplines. In our study site (Stubai Valley, Tyrol/Austria), we applied a sequence of steps including the characterization of the social-ecological system and identification of key drivers that influence farmers’ management decisions. We then developed three scenarios, i.e., “trend”, “positive” and “negative” future development of farming conditions and assessed respective future land use changes. Results indicate that within the “trend” and “positive” scenarios pluri-activity (various sources of income) prevents considerable changes in land use and land cover and promotes the resilience of farming systems. Contrarily, reductions in subsidies and changes in consumer behavior are the most important key drivers in the negative scenario and lead to distinct abandonment of grassland, predominantly in the sub-alpine zone of our study site. Our conceptual approach, i.e., the combination of social and ecological methods and the integration of local stakeholders’ knowledge into spatial scenario analysis, resulted in highly detailed and spatially explicit results that can provide a basis for further community development recommendations.

Suggested Citation

  • Marina Kohler & Rike Stotten & Melanie Steinbacher & Georg Leitinger & Erich Tasser & Uta Schirpke & Ulrike Tappeiner & Markus Schermer, 2017. "Participative Spatial Scenario Analysis for Alpine Ecosystems," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 60(4), pages 679-692, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:60:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s00267-017-0903-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-017-0903-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-017-0903-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-017-0903-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:60:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s00267-017-0903-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.