IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v59y2017i5d10.1007_s00267-017-0824-5.html

Pollution Assessment of the Biobío River (Chile): Prioritization of Substances of Concern Under an Ecotoxicological Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Álvaro Alonso

    (University of Alcalá, Department of Life Sciences, Docent Unit of Ecology, Faculty of Sciences
    University of Concepción, Department of Aquatic Systems, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Center EULA-Chile and Center CRHIAM)

  • Ricardo Figueroa

    (University of Concepción, Department of Aquatic Systems, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Center EULA-Chile and Center CRHIAM)

  • Pilar Castro-Díez

    (University of Alcalá, Department of Life Sciences, Docent Unit of Ecology, Faculty of Sciences)

Abstract

The water demand for human activities is rapidly increasing in developing countries. Under these circumstances, preserving aquatic ecosystems should be a priority which requires the development of quality criteria. In this study we perform a preliminary prioritization of the risky substances based on reported ecotoxicological studies and guidelines for the Biobío watershed (Central Chile). Our specific aims are (1) reviewing the scientific information on the aquatic pollution of this watershed, (2) determining the presence and concentration of potential toxic substances in water, sediment and effluents, (3) searching for quality criteria developed by other countries for the selected substances and (4) prioritizing the most risky substances by means of deterministic ecotoxicological risk assessment. We found that paper and mill industries were the main sources of point pollution, while forestry and agriculture were mostly responsible for non-point pollution. The most risky organic substances in the water column were pentachlorophenol and heptachlor, while the most relevant inorganic ones were aluminum, copper, unionized ammonia and mercury. The most risky organic and inorganic substances in the sediment were phenanthrene and mercury, respectively. Our review highlights that an important effort has been done to monitor pollution in the Biobío watershed. However there are emerging pollutants and banned compounds—especially in sediments—that require to be monitored. We suggest that site-specific water quality criteria and sediment quality criteria should be developed for the Biobío watershed, considering the toxicity of mixtures of chemicals to endemic species, and the high natural background level of aluminum in the Biobío.

Suggested Citation

  • Álvaro Alonso & Ricardo Figueroa & Pilar Castro-Díez, 2017. "Pollution Assessment of the Biobío River (Chile): Prioritization of Substances of Concern Under an Ecotoxicological Approach," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 59(5), pages 856-869, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:59:y:2017:i:5:d:10.1007_s00267-017-0824-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-017-0824-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-017-0824-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-017-0824-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:59:y:2017:i:5:d:10.1007_s00267-017-0824-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.