IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v59y2017i4d10.1007_s00267-016-0811-2.html

Mowing Submerged Macrophytes in Shallow Lakes with Alternative Stable States: Battling the Good Guys?

Author

Listed:
  • Jan J. Kuiper

    (Netherlands Institute of Ecology, Department of Aquatic Ecology
    Wageningen University, Aquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management Group, Department of Environmental Sciences)

  • Michiel J. J. M. Verhofstad

    (Netherlands Institute of Ecology, Department of Aquatic Ecology)

  • Evelien L. M. Louwers

    (Netherlands Institute of Ecology, Department of Aquatic Ecology
    Witteveen+Bos
    Utrecht University, Ecology & Biodiversity, Institute of Environmental Biology)

  • Elisabeth S. Bakker

    (Netherlands Institute of Ecology, Department of Aquatic Ecology)

  • Robert J. Brederveld

    (Witteveen+Bos)

  • Luuk P. A. van Gerven

    (Netherlands Institute of Ecology, Department of Aquatic Ecology
    Wageningen University, Aquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management Group, Department of Environmental Sciences)

  • Annette B. G. Janssen

    (Netherlands Institute of Ecology, Department of Aquatic Ecology
    Wageningen University, Aquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management Group, Department of Environmental Sciences)

  • Jeroen J. M. de Klein

    (Wageningen University, Aquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management Group, Department of Environmental Sciences)

  • Wolf M. Mooij

    (Netherlands Institute of Ecology, Department of Aquatic Ecology
    Wageningen University, Aquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management Group, Department of Environmental Sciences)

Abstract

Submerged macrophytes play an important role in maintaining good water quality in shallow lakes. Yet extensive stands easily interfere with various services provided by these lakes, and harvesting is increasingly applied as a management measure. Because shallow lakes may possess alternative stable states over a wide range of environmental conditions, designing a successful mowing strategy is challenging, given the important role of macrophytes in stabilizing the clear water state. In this study, the integrated ecosystem model PCLake is used to explore the consequences of mowing, in terms of reducing nuisance and ecosystem stability, for a wide range of external nutrient loadings, mowing intensities and timings. Elodea is used as a model species. Additionally, we use PCLake to estimate how much phosphorus is removed with the harvested biomass, and evaluate the long-term effect of harvesting. Our model indicates that mowing can temporarily reduce nuisance caused by submerged plants in the first weeks after cutting, particularly when external nutrient loading is fairly low. The risk of instigating a regime shift can be tempered by mowing halfway the growing season when the resilience of the system is highest, as our model showed. Up to half of the phosphorus entering the system can potentially be removed along with the harvested biomass. As a result, prolonged mowing can prevent an oligo—to mesotrophic lake from becoming eutrophic to a certain extent, as our model shows that the critical nutrient loading, where the lake shifts to the turbid phytoplankton-dominated state, can be slightly increased.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan J. Kuiper & Michiel J. J. M. Verhofstad & Evelien L. M. Louwers & Elisabeth S. Bakker & Robert J. Brederveld & Luuk P. A. van Gerven & Annette B. G. Janssen & Jeroen J. M. de Klein & Wolf M. Mooij, 2017. "Mowing Submerged Macrophytes in Shallow Lakes with Alternative Stable States: Battling the Good Guys?," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 619-634, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:59:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s00267-016-0811-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-016-0811-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-016-0811-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-016-0811-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:59:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s00267-016-0811-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.