IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v59y2017i2d10.1007_s00267-016-0785-0.html

Adaptive Management as an Effective Strategy: Interdisciplinary Perceptions for Natural Resources Management

Author

Listed:
  • Lindsay M. Dreiss

    (University of Connecticut, Department of Natural Resources and the Environment)

  • Jan-Michael Hessenauer

    (University of Connecticut, Department of Natural Resources and the Environment)

  • Lucas R. Nathan

    (University of Connecticut, Department of Natural Resources and the Environment)

  • Kelly M. O’Connor

    (University of Connecticut, Department of Natural Resources and the Environment)

  • Marjorie R. Liberati

    (University of Connecticut, Department of Natural Resources and the Environment)

  • Danielle P. Kloster

    (University of Connecticut, Department of Natural Resources and the Environment)

  • Janet R. Barclay

    (University of Connecticut, Department of Natural Resources and the Environment)

  • Jason C. Vokoun

    (University of Connecticut, Department of Natural Resources and the Environment)

  • Anita T. Morzillo

    (University of Connecticut, Department of Natural Resources and the Environment)

Abstract

Adaptive management is a well-established approach to managing natural resources, but there is little evidence demonstrating effectiveness of adaptive management over traditional management techniques. Peer-reviewed literature attempts to draw conclusions about adaptive management effectiveness using social perceptions, but those studies are largely restricted to employees of US federal organizations. To gain a more comprehensive insight into perceived adaptive management effectiveness, this study aimed to broaden the suite of disciplines, professional affiliations, and geographic backgrounds represented by both practitioners and scholars. A questionnaire contained a series of questions concerning factors that lead to or inhibit effective management, followed by another set of questions focused on adaptive management. Using a continuum representing strategies of both adaptive management and traditional management, respondents selected those strategies that they perceived as being effective. Overall, characteristics (i.e., strategies, stakeholders, and barriers) identified by respondents as contributing to effective management closely aligned with adaptive management. Responses were correlated to the type of adaptive management experience rather than an individual’s discipline, occupational, or regional affiliation. In particular, perceptions of characteristics contributing to adaptive management effectiveness varied between respondents who identified as adaptive management scholars (i.e., no implementation experience) and adaptive management practitioners. Together, these results supported two concepts that make adaptive management effective: practitioners emphasized adaptive management’s value as a long-term approach and scholars noted the importance of stakeholder involvement. Even so, more communication between practitioners and scholars regarding adaptive management effectiveness could promote interdisciplinary learning and problem solving for improved resources management.

Suggested Citation

  • Lindsay M. Dreiss & Jan-Michael Hessenauer & Lucas R. Nathan & Kelly M. O’Connor & Marjorie R. Liberati & Danielle P. Kloster & Janet R. Barclay & Jason C. Vokoun & Anita T. Morzillo, 2017. "Adaptive Management as an Effective Strategy: Interdisciplinary Perceptions for Natural Resources Management," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 218-229, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:59:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-016-0785-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-016-0785-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-016-0785-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-016-0785-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:59:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s00267-016-0785-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.