IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v59y2017i1d10.1007_s00267-016-0766-3.html

National-Level Wetland Policy Specificity and Goals Vary According to Political and Economic Indicators

Author

Listed:
  • Alex W. Peimer

    (University of Illinois, Department of Geography and Geographic Information Science)

  • Adrianna E. Krzywicka

    (University of Illinois, Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences)

  • Dora B. Cohen

    (University of Illinois, Program in Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation Biology)

  • Kyle Van den Bosch

    (University of Illinois, Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences)

  • Valerie L. Buxton

    (University of Illinois, Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences)

  • Natalie A. Stevenson

    (University of Illinois, Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences)

  • Jeffrey W. Matthews

    (University of Illinois, Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences)

Abstract

Growing recognition of the importance of wetlands to human and ecosystem well-being has led countries worldwide to implement wetland protection policies. Different countries have taken different approaches to wetland protection by implementing various policies, including territorial exclusion, market-based offsetting, and incentive programs for land users. Our objective was to describe the relationship between components of national-level wetland protection policies and national characteristics, including natural resource, economic, social, and political factors. We compiled data on the wetland policies of all 193 countries recognized by the U.N. and described the relationships among wetland policy goals and wetland protection mechanisms using non-metric multidimensional scaling. The first non-metric multidimensional scaling axis strongly correlated with whether a country had a wetland-specific environmental policy in place. Adoption of a comprehensive, wetland-specific policy was positively associated with degree of democracy and a commitment to establishing protected areas. The second non-metric multidimensional scaling axis defined a continuum of policy goals and mechanisms by which wetlands are protected, with goals to protect wetland ecosystem services on one end of the spectrum and goals to protect biodiversity on the other. Goals for protecting ecosystem services were frequently cited in policy documents of countries with agriculture-based economies, whereas goals associated with wetland biodiversity tended to be associated with tourism-based economies. We argue that the components of a country’s wetland policies reflect national-level resource and economic characteristics. Understanding the relationship between the type of wetland policy countries adopt and national-level characteristics is critical for international efforts to protect wetlands.

Suggested Citation

  • Alex W. Peimer & Adrianna E. Krzywicka & Dora B. Cohen & Kyle Van den Bosch & Valerie L. Buxton & Natalie A. Stevenson & Jeffrey W. Matthews, 2017. "National-Level Wetland Policy Specificity and Goals Vary According to Political and Economic Indicators," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 141-153, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:59:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s00267-016-0766-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-016-0766-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-016-0766-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-016-0766-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:59:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s00267-016-0766-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.