IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v58y2016i6d10.1007_s00267-016-0765-4.html

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Green Infrastructures on Community Stormwater Reduction and Utilization: A Case of Beijing, China

Author

Listed:
  • Wen Liu

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences, State Key Laboratory for Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences
    Chinese Academy of Sciences, Key Laboratory of Ecohydrology of Inland River Basin, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute)

  • Weiping Chen

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences, State Key Laboratory for Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences)

  • Qi Feng

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences, Key Laboratory of Ecohydrology of Inland River Basin, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute)

  • Chi Peng

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences, State Key Laboratory for Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences)

  • Peng Kang

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences, State Key Laboratory for Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences)

Abstract

Cost-benefit analysis is demanded for guiding the plan, design and construction of green infrastructure practices in rapidly urbanized regions. We developed a framework to calculate the costs and benefits of different green infrastructures on stormwater reduction and utilization. A typical community of 54,783 m2 in Beijing was selected for case study. For the four designed green infrastructure scenarios (green space depression, porous brick pavement, storage pond, and their combination), the average annual costs of green infrastructure facilities are ranged from 40.54 to 110.31 thousand yuan, and the average of the cost per m3 stormwater reduction and utilization is 4.61 yuan. The total average annual benefits of stormwater reduction and utilization by green infrastructures of the community are ranged from 63.24 to 250.15 thousand yuan, and the benefit per m3 stormwater reduction and utilization is ranged from 5.78 to 11.14 yuan. The average ratio of average annual benefit to cost of four green infrastructure facilities is 1.91. The integrated facilities had the highest economic feasibility with a benefit to cost ratio of 2.27, and followed by the storage pond construction with a benefit to cost ratio of 2.14. The results suggested that while the stormwater reduction and utilization by green infrastructures had higher construction and maintenance costs, their comprehensive benefits including source water replacements benefits, environmental benefits and avoided cost benefits are potentially interesting. The green infrastructure practices should be promoted for sustainable management of urban stormwater.

Suggested Citation

  • Wen Liu & Weiping Chen & Qi Feng & Chi Peng & Peng Kang, 2016. "Cost-Benefit Analysis of Green Infrastructures on Community Stormwater Reduction and Utilization: A Case of Beijing, China," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 58(6), pages 1015-1026, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:58:y:2016:i:6:d:10.1007_s00267-016-0765-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-016-0765-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-016-0765-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-016-0765-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:58:y:2016:i:6:d:10.1007_s00267-016-0765-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.