IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v58y2016i5d10.1007_s00267-016-0754-7.html

Setting Preferences of High and Low Use River Recreationists: How Different are They?

Author

Listed:
  • Silvia Kainzinger

    (University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Institute of Landscape Development, Recreation and Conservation Planning, Department of Spatial, Landscape and Infrastructure Sciences
    West Virginia University, Recreation, Parks and Tourism Program, Division of Forestry and Natural Resources)

  • Arne Arnberger

    (University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Institute of Landscape Development, Recreation and Conservation Planning, Department of Spatial, Landscape and Infrastructure Sciences)

  • Robert C. Burns

    (West Virginia University, Recreation, Parks and Tourism Program, Division of Forestry and Natural Resources)

Abstract

Whitewater boaters often choose a river based on their preferences for attributes important for their trip experience. This study explored whether preferences and tradeoffs of whitewater boaters for social, resource, and managerial attributes of riverscapes differ among a high and a low use river in the United States by employing a stated choice approach. River trip scenarios were displayed using verbal descriptions and computer-generated photographs. Results indicate that use levels were more important for boaters on the low use river, whereas river difficulty and river access fee was of higher importance for the high use river boaters, who are more involved in this whitewater activity. Preferences for waiting times and trip length did not differ between the samples. Findings suggest that whitewater boaters of high and low use rivers have a different tradeoff behavior among river setting attributes, which has implications for river recreation management.

Suggested Citation

  • Silvia Kainzinger & Arne Arnberger & Robert C. Burns, 2016. "Setting Preferences of High and Low Use River Recreationists: How Different are They?," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 58(5), pages 767-779, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:58:y:2016:i:5:d:10.1007_s00267-016-0754-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-016-0754-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-016-0754-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-016-0754-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:58:y:2016:i:5:d:10.1007_s00267-016-0754-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.