IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envman/v58y2016i4d10.1007_s00267-016-0736-9.html

Site Preparation Drives Long-Term Plant Community Dynamics in Restored Tallgrass Prairie: A Case Study in Southeastern South Dakota

Author

Listed:
  • Alice R. Millikin

    (University of South Dakota, Department of Biology)

  • Meghann E. Jarchow

    (University of South Dakota, Department of Biology)

  • Karen L. Olmstead

    (Salisbury University, Richard A. Henson School of Science and Technology)

  • Rustan E. Krentz

    (University of South Dakota, Department of Biology)

  • Mark D. Dixon

    (University of South Dakota, Department of Biology)

Abstract

Most tallgrass prairies have been destroyed or altered, making restoration an important component to their conservation. Our goal was to evaluate progress 12-years post-restoration at Spirit Mound Historic Prairie and determine whether the outcomes varied based on different land use and restoration histories across the site. We examined changes in plant diversity, richness, evenness, non-native species relative abundance, and community composition from 2004 to 2013. Areas with different restoration treatments and land-use histories showed divergent results. Seventy percent of the site, previously annual row crop, was reconstructed using herbicide application followed by native seeding (hereafter reconstruction). Areas that were previously grazed, 15 % of the site, were restored with only partial seeding and no herbicide treatment (hereafter rehabilitation). Species richness and diversity increased over 40 % in the reconstruction since 2004 and remained over 1.9 times higher in the reconstructed areas than rehabilitated areas. Diversity did not change in the rehabilitation, but richness increased 47 % since 2004. Evenness decreased 11–26 % over time in both areas. Non-native species relative abundance did not change from 2004 to 2013, and remained five times higher in the rehabilitation than the reconstruction. Native C4 grass and forb abundance increased over time in the reconstruction, whereas non-native C3 grasses remained dominant in the rehabilitation. These results showed that restoration outcomes were radically different 12-years post-restoration among areas with different prior land uses that were subjected to different restoration practices. Long-term assessments are important to accurately determine restoration progress and inform management decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Alice R. Millikin & Meghann E. Jarchow & Karen L. Olmstead & Rustan E. Krentz & Mark D. Dixon, 2016. "Site Preparation Drives Long-Term Plant Community Dynamics in Restored Tallgrass Prairie: A Case Study in Southeastern South Dakota," Environmental Management, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 597-605, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:58:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s00267-016-0736-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s00267-016-0736-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00267-016-0736-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00267-016-0736-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envman:v:58:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s00267-016-0736-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.